GVSU PSY 357 Exam 3 Newest 2026 Questions
and Correct Detailed Answers Already Graded A+
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Task/stimuli used - CORRECT ANSWER-The
sentence itself regarding editors
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Independent/dependent variables used in design -
CORRECT ANSWER-Two levels:
One editor context
Two editor context
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Predictions made by different theories - CORRECT
ANSWER-Interactionist Approach:
If readers are given one editor, they get garden pathed, and slowed down at
"agreed"
Paragraph context (other information) can override minimal attachment
,Syntax First/Garden Path Approach:
No effects of context on reading times.
Minimal attachment and syntax operate independently of context
Paragraph context has no influence on initial syntactic computations
Be able to identify an accurate description of why it may or may not be important
to study garden path sentences - CORRECT ANSWER-It is important to study
garden path sentences because such sentences DO occur in real life, and our
language facilities must deal with them.
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements:
__Theories/hypotheses tested - CORRECT ANSWER-Syntax First &
Interactionist Approaches
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Results of experiment - CORRECT ANSWER-Results
supported the modular, Garden Path Model
No immediate effect of context found at disambiguating region (agreed)
, Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Implications for Modularity - CORRECT ANSWER-
Results do not show support for the interactionism side of things. Rather that
support the syntax-first/garden path hypothesis and theory. Language must be
modular.
Understand with good depth how the following studies provide evidence against
the Garden Path Model:
__a) Which specific piece of evidence (i.e., specific finding from a specific
language or set of languages)
suggests that Late Closure is not universal? How? - CORRECT ANSWER-Late
closure is not a universal strategy. Spanish and Dutch attach to relative clauses
(gives information about the person or thing mentioned) in the first noun phrase.
Understand with good depth how the following studies provide evidence against
the Garden Path Model: __b) Trueswell et al. (1994)—Understand its methods,
results, and implications. - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence for semantics
influencing perception. Defendant v evidence sentence, previous context would
completely circumvent garden pathing, meaning semantics overrode syntax.
__4) Regarding the Tanenhaus visual world paradigm experiment:
and Correct Detailed Answers Already Graded A+
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Task/stimuli used - CORRECT ANSWER-The
sentence itself regarding editors
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Independent/dependent variables used in design -
CORRECT ANSWER-Two levels:
One editor context
Two editor context
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Predictions made by different theories - CORRECT
ANSWER-Interactionist Approach:
If readers are given one editor, they get garden pathed, and slowed down at
"agreed"
Paragraph context (other information) can override minimal attachment
,Syntax First/Garden Path Approach:
No effects of context on reading times.
Minimal attachment and syntax operate independently of context
Paragraph context has no influence on initial syntactic computations
Be able to identify an accurate description of why it may or may not be important
to study garden path sentences - CORRECT ANSWER-It is important to study
garden path sentences because such sentences DO occur in real life, and our
language facilities must deal with them.
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements:
__Theories/hypotheses tested - CORRECT ANSWER-Syntax First &
Interactionist Approaches
Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Results of experiment - CORRECT ANSWER-Results
supported the modular, Garden Path Model
No immediate effect of context found at disambiguating region (agreed)
, Regarding the Ferreira & Clifton (1986) experiment: Be able to identify or describe
the following elements: __Implications for Modularity - CORRECT ANSWER-
Results do not show support for the interactionism side of things. Rather that
support the syntax-first/garden path hypothesis and theory. Language must be
modular.
Understand with good depth how the following studies provide evidence against
the Garden Path Model:
__a) Which specific piece of evidence (i.e., specific finding from a specific
language or set of languages)
suggests that Late Closure is not universal? How? - CORRECT ANSWER-Late
closure is not a universal strategy. Spanish and Dutch attach to relative clauses
(gives information about the person or thing mentioned) in the first noun phrase.
Understand with good depth how the following studies provide evidence against
the Garden Path Model: __b) Trueswell et al. (1994)—Understand its methods,
results, and implications. - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence for semantics
influencing perception. Defendant v evidence sentence, previous context would
completely circumvent garden pathing, meaning semantics overrode syntax.
__4) Regarding the Tanenhaus visual world paradigm experiment:
