Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Scriptie

Physical activity among older adults

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
8
Cijfer
A
Geüpload op
15-06-2021
Geschreven in
2019/2020

OBJECTIVE: To prepare an introductory-level systematic review on designated topic. One of two topics will be randomly allocated to your team (see page 2). The first four workshops will focus on Assignment 1. Assignments in this subject are complex and will need to be completed over a couple of weeks. It is highly unlikely that you will be able to produce a review of an acceptable standard a few hours before the assignment is due. It is through the process of doing the assignment and the related exercises that you will gain useful skills. TEAM WORK To complete this assignment, you will work in teams in class but you will complete the assignment individually. You can include any relevant work completed in class as part of your assignment submission. Team members will have the same topic but may develop different research questions or research objectives. They may also have a different range of included studies. Check with your workshop facilitator that your research question is suitable. The purpose of working in teams is facilitate your learning in the workshops. The workshops will focus on the types of skills you need to complete the assignment. ____________________________________________________________________________________ LATE SUBMISSION OF WORK The University policy on late submission of work can be found here: • The essence of this policy is: • Penalties for late submission shall be 5% of the total possible marks for each delay in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days (not including weekends or holidays) after the due date. • Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the fifth (5 th ) working day after the due date; or • Students must seek a formal extension to submit after the deadline where there are valid extenuating circumstances. Extensions must normally be sought at least three (3) days before the submission date, if this is not possible, you must apply for Special Consideration within three days of the assignment due date. • Where an extension of time has been approved, this policy and the same penalties apply to the revised due date. It is in your best interest to alert the Subject Coordinator as soon as you realise that you will have a problem meeting the deadline. TASK DETAILS In health care the purpose of systematic reviews is to summarize the best evidence from research. The conduct of a systematic review is itself recognised as research. The type of evidence summarised in a systematic review will depend on the research question asked. Systematic reviews cover a wide range of research questions and are used extensively in contemporary health care. In this assignment you will learn how to prepare a simple, introductory-level systematic review addressing a research question on one of two topics. INSTRUCTIONS Your review will include at least four published studies (two will be provided). You will develop and describe a simple search strategy to find suitable studies to answer your question, provide a summary of your appraisal of the included studies, a table (or grid) of the relevant data you extract from each published paper, a narrative summary of key aspects of the included studies (for example, study design, study participants, intervention/exposures, outcomes measured, and results/findings), and a comparative analysis of the different studies. You will also need to provide a conclusion to your review. Number of words: 1,500-1,700 (not including title page, references or grid). You will need to include at least 4 references (the included studies) and the grid/table showing the data extracted from each paper. Structure of your review Introduction  Brief background on topic and why a review is needed supported with the use of references (these are additional to those included in the review analysis).  Research question and/or objectives (this should tell readers what the review aimed to do). Method and Analysis  Description of the search strategy including the use of key words, and the database tools/features that were utilised as part of the search strategy (e.g. MeSH headings; Boolean operators; truncations; wildcards; limits). You also have to explain the reasons why you chose the studies that you included in your review.  Description of the critical appraisal process, this is, the evaluation of the methodological soundness of the papers. You have to describe what you did from at least four relevant papers and report the results. Results  Narrative summaries (of key aspects, for example, study design, study participants, intervention/exposures, outcomes measured, and results/findings) from at least four relevant papers. This is where you summarise the key characteristics from each study (note this is NOT a summary of each study but a summary of the information in the columns of your grid. You will need to use your judgement about which information is important to include in the text of your review).  Comparison from different studies (similarities, differences, gaps, inconsistencies). Conclusion  What is the answer to your research question? Did you meet your research objectives?  Analysis of strengths and limitations of the included studies and identification of any gaps to address in future studies. Attachments (These are NOT included in the word count)  Reference list  You HAVE TO include your grid/table as an attachment. Verbal presentation This assignment includes a verbal presentation to the class, where you share your answer to your research question with your workshop group. This will take place in the Week 5 workshops. Topics: PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN OLDER POPULATIONS Lee, Y. S. (2005). Gender differences in physical activity and walking among older adults. Journal of Women & Aging, 17(1-2), 55-70. Loh, V. H., Rachele, J. N., Brown, W. J., Ghani, F., Washington, S., & Turrell, G. (2019). The potential for walkability to narrow neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in physical function: A case study of middle-aged to older adults in Brisbane, Australia. Health & Place, 56, 99-105. doi: 10.1016/hplace.2019.01.020 DRUG TESTING AT SOCIAL EVENTS including MUSIC FESTIVALS Luther, M., Gardiner, F., Lenson, S., & Caldicott, D. (2018). An effective risk minimization strategy applied to an outdoor music festival: A multi-agency approach. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 33(2), 220-224. Day, N., Criss, J., Griffiths, B., Gujral, S. K., John-Leader, F., Johnston, J., & Pit, S. (2018). Music festival attendees’ illicit drug use, knowledge and practices regarding drug content and purity: a cross-sectional survey. Harm Reduction Journal, 15(1). Reference for appraisal tool Horey D and Nava Buenfil F (2016) 2AHR Study Quality Appraisal Tool [Tool] Melbourne; La Trobe University. (This tool will be provided)

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Surname 1


Student’s Name

Professor’s Name

Course Details

Submission Date

Physical Activity in Older Populations

Regular physical activity (PA) is likened with many wellness benefits. However,

inactivity is a prevalent concern among the older populations, which impacts their health and

functionality. Consequently, increasing PA among the old has become a critical public health

concern in Australia. According to the Victoria Burden of Disease study, there is 7.3 percent

mortality rate in males and 9.3 Percent in females all aged above 65 due to physical inactivity

(Rao, Warburton & Bartlett, 175). Some groups are especially at danger of inactive lifestyles

such as culturally and ethnically variant, the socioeconomically challenged, and the less

educated. These categories of older adults have high rates of disablement and are the least

included in physical activity programs.

While older populations who are diverse in culture are often the targets for community-

based PA intervention, there is little information that substantiates how appropriate PA

measurement practices are to these people. Besides, PA participation can be socially developed

with culture invariance linked to a particular practice. This survey seeks to find credibility of

proof of materials in culturally and linguistically sundry older people who participate in

community schemes through a comparison of self-report physical activity approximates and

quantifiers of physical operative. The research question that the study focusses on is:

, Surname 2


 Do culturally and linguistically heterogeneous backgrounds have differences in PA

among elder adult populations?

 What are the barriers preventing older adults from diverse backgrounds from

participating in physical activity?

 What are the predictors of PA engagement in culturally-heterogeneous batch of older

individuals?

Method and Analysis

Study Setting and Recruitment

The survey was established in selected cities of Melbourne, a place of relative

socioeconomic challenge, significantly poor health, and large ethnic communities. Vietnamese,

Italian and Anglo-Celtic old men and women of age 60 and above from Melbourne were selected

through community groups, and welfare agencies. Italian population constituted a developed

immigrant group that settled in Australia post WWII (Rao, Warburton & Bartlett, 177). The

sample’s exclusion technique included eliminating those residing in residential care and severe

dementia that could not allow participation. Little understanding of English was not used in

exclusion criteria. Seventy-five individuals completed the study, and the study sample included

25 Anglo-Celtic, 25 Italian, and 25 Vietnamese men and women.

Survey Instrument

The study relied on traditional and globally ratified tools. The St. Louis scale, for

quantifying PA in ethnicities (Brownson Change 473). The instrument evaluates the extent in

which some aspects derail individuals from engaging in physical exercise. The scale poses

questions about safety, walking, and other factors while basing items on 5-point Likert scale.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
15 juni 2021
Aantal pagina's
8
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
SCRIPTIE
Begeleider(s)
Lukas
Jaar
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

$10.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
Risper

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
Risper University of the Virgin Islands
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
-
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
40
Laatst verkocht
-

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen