SOC 450
Analysis of the Threats Defense Argument
SOC 450- Solutions to Global Issues
Globalization and Cultural Taboos
Introduction
Over time, environmental challenges have driven humans to weigh the severity of the
impacts on our climate. However, any time a new threat emerges, the current threats tend to be
more serious. Globalization and ethnic taboos have added to fundamental challenges around the
world in recent years. The following discussion offers profound insight into globalization and
cultural taboos. The paper looks at the effect and scope of the two threats. The essay also
discusses why, as opposed to climate change, energy supplies, poor health of whole
communities, and inefficient use of technology, the two risks are described as less important.
Next, there is a debate about globalization, accompanied by cultural taboos.
Threat 1- Globalization
To create an increase of technological, cultural, and political practices, globalization is
the unification of many world areas. Globalization, especially in the commercial sector, is often
viewed as a positive development. Trading across borders has given way to the trade of goods,
technologies, ideas, information, and investment. Recent research on globalization has shown it
to be a modern global challenge (1). Globalization is said to add new risks to the world economy
by unifying various nations and empires. It is hypothesized that the high degree at which
globalization has grown would bring greater competitiveness in the world economy, more
imitation of goods, and to name only a few, a spike in price and profit volatility (1).
Globalization also transitions between industrialized and emerging countries in the balance of
influence (1).
, Although globalization poses a worldwide threat, it is less critical than other threats.
Climate change, energy supplies, poor health of entire communities, and excessive use of
technologies are risks that are more vital due to globalization (2). First, with the state's power in
doubt, the influence of globalization as a challenge varies. While globalization can affect all
nations, developing countries are typically hardly affected by these global powerhouses. It is
convenient for countries with the potential to change the world economy to monitor their
integration into the market and the movement of money (2). This means that if appropriate work
is implemented, globalization's challenge and its impact on the environment can be buffered.
Though globalization has a strong influence, developed countries have managed to defend
themselves as well. On the opposite, a given nation's security from a threat such as a climate
change is complicated.
Globalization poses itself as a less vital threat when human life is put into account. When
it emerges as a primary concern for humanity's survival, a danger like bad health among whole
societies gains a target over globalization. For all, even with a falling economy, the odds of
success are still high. Health decline among populations, however, poses issues because of the
possibility of mortality. When weighed at the moment, an increase in wellbeing beats integration
into more economies (3). This argument is also highlighted by the United Nations, that the World
Health Organization oversees global health services and wellbeing as one of its key priorities.
Finally, in deciding which one is more important than the other, a specific problem's
sustenance levels could be vital. It may gain more prominence in energy sources as a hazard
since particular sources, particularly non-renewable energy sources, may run out over time (3).
An illustration of non-renewable fuels is oil. In the entire world, there are just a small number of
supplies of crude. Over time, the oil reserves will be exhausted.
Analysis of the Threats Defense Argument
SOC 450- Solutions to Global Issues
Globalization and Cultural Taboos
Introduction
Over time, environmental challenges have driven humans to weigh the severity of the
impacts on our climate. However, any time a new threat emerges, the current threats tend to be
more serious. Globalization and ethnic taboos have added to fundamental challenges around the
world in recent years. The following discussion offers profound insight into globalization and
cultural taboos. The paper looks at the effect and scope of the two threats. The essay also
discusses why, as opposed to climate change, energy supplies, poor health of whole
communities, and inefficient use of technology, the two risks are described as less important.
Next, there is a debate about globalization, accompanied by cultural taboos.
Threat 1- Globalization
To create an increase of technological, cultural, and political practices, globalization is
the unification of many world areas. Globalization, especially in the commercial sector, is often
viewed as a positive development. Trading across borders has given way to the trade of goods,
technologies, ideas, information, and investment. Recent research on globalization has shown it
to be a modern global challenge (1). Globalization is said to add new risks to the world economy
by unifying various nations and empires. It is hypothesized that the high degree at which
globalization has grown would bring greater competitiveness in the world economy, more
imitation of goods, and to name only a few, a spike in price and profit volatility (1).
Globalization also transitions between industrialized and emerging countries in the balance of
influence (1).
, Although globalization poses a worldwide threat, it is less critical than other threats.
Climate change, energy supplies, poor health of entire communities, and excessive use of
technologies are risks that are more vital due to globalization (2). First, with the state's power in
doubt, the influence of globalization as a challenge varies. While globalization can affect all
nations, developing countries are typically hardly affected by these global powerhouses. It is
convenient for countries with the potential to change the world economy to monitor their
integration into the market and the movement of money (2). This means that if appropriate work
is implemented, globalization's challenge and its impact on the environment can be buffered.
Though globalization has a strong influence, developed countries have managed to defend
themselves as well. On the opposite, a given nation's security from a threat such as a climate
change is complicated.
Globalization poses itself as a less vital threat when human life is put into account. When
it emerges as a primary concern for humanity's survival, a danger like bad health among whole
societies gains a target over globalization. For all, even with a falling economy, the odds of
success are still high. Health decline among populations, however, poses issues because of the
possibility of mortality. When weighed at the moment, an increase in wellbeing beats integration
into more economies (3). This argument is also highlighted by the United Nations, that the World
Health Organization oversees global health services and wellbeing as one of its key priorities.
Finally, in deciding which one is more important than the other, a specific problem's
sustenance levels could be vital. It may gain more prominence in energy sources as a hazard
since particular sources, particularly non-renewable energy sources, may run out over time (3).
An illustration of non-renewable fuels is oil. In the entire world, there are just a small number of
supplies of crude. Over time, the oil reserves will be exhausted.
