1
Is Euthanasia Ethical or Not?
Student Name
University
, 2
Introduction
Euthanasia is among the issues that have been debated for long globally. Euthanasia had
been a relevant matter in human rights discussions as it likewise influences ethical and legal
matters relating to patients and healthcare providers. Euthanasia is a medical field concept that
means the intentional speeding of a person's death pegged on terminal medical conditions.
Healthcare providers always encounter ethical challenges when caring for terminally ill patients,
and they have to choose between the difficulty of undesirable alternatives. They are commonly
obligated to utilize their moral reasoning in solving these ethical challenges. In the modern
world, despite the technological and scientific advancement mostly in the laws and regulations
field linked to human health, there is still haziness and controversy on the euthanasia concept.
Hence this ethical dilemma might enforce healthcare providers to legal and ethical danger. This
paper supports euthanasia by arguing that it is morally allowed for terminally ill patients who
have drained all other reasonable treatment alternatives.
Argument
a. Patient Autonomy
Euthanasia supporters argue that euthanasia is highly beneficial and easing to a terminally
ill patient whose condition is irreversible. The patient’s life support becomes a huge financial
and mental burden to his or her friends and family. Several people perceive death as an end to a
person's life, but in several cases, it is likewise the end to someone suffering. Euthanasia
advocates argue that euthanasia is closely linked to the American values of personal freedom and
liberty of choice (Emanuel, 1994). The American constitution indicates that we are entitled to
freedom, life and quest for happiness. When a person's quest for happiness entails a speedy and
painless death, they are entitled to it. When the quest for happiness is someone's fundamental
Is Euthanasia Ethical or Not?
Student Name
University
, 2
Introduction
Euthanasia is among the issues that have been debated for long globally. Euthanasia had
been a relevant matter in human rights discussions as it likewise influences ethical and legal
matters relating to patients and healthcare providers. Euthanasia is a medical field concept that
means the intentional speeding of a person's death pegged on terminal medical conditions.
Healthcare providers always encounter ethical challenges when caring for terminally ill patients,
and they have to choose between the difficulty of undesirable alternatives. They are commonly
obligated to utilize their moral reasoning in solving these ethical challenges. In the modern
world, despite the technological and scientific advancement mostly in the laws and regulations
field linked to human health, there is still haziness and controversy on the euthanasia concept.
Hence this ethical dilemma might enforce healthcare providers to legal and ethical danger. This
paper supports euthanasia by arguing that it is morally allowed for terminally ill patients who
have drained all other reasonable treatment alternatives.
Argument
a. Patient Autonomy
Euthanasia supporters argue that euthanasia is highly beneficial and easing to a terminally
ill patient whose condition is irreversible. The patient’s life support becomes a huge financial
and mental burden to his or her friends and family. Several people perceive death as an end to a
person's life, but in several cases, it is likewise the end to someone suffering. Euthanasia
advocates argue that euthanasia is closely linked to the American values of personal freedom and
liberty of choice (Emanuel, 1994). The American constitution indicates that we are entitled to
freedom, life and quest for happiness. When a person's quest for happiness entails a speedy and
painless death, they are entitled to it. When the quest for happiness is someone's fundamental
