Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Unit V Essay.docx MHR 6401 Riser v. QEP Energy Columbia Southern University MHR 6401, Employment Law Riser v. QEP Energy Ms. Kathy Riser worked for the company Questar Exploration and Production (Questar). She began her employment in 1997 and hel

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
3
Geüpload op
30-07-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Unit V E MHR 6401 Riser v. QEP Energy Columbia Southern University MHR 6401, Employment Law Riser v. QEP Energy Ms. Kathy Riser worked for the company Questar Exploration and Production (Questar). She began her employment in 1997 and held the position of Administration Services Representative II. On July 1, 2010 QEP was spun off from Questar and became its own independent company (Walsh, 2019). Ms. Riser remained with the company and continued her duties. On September 8, 2011, Ms. Riser was terminated from the company. From the date of the spun off until her termination, Ms. Riser had submitted numerous requests for pay raises due to the increase of her duties. Her requests were denied and after her termination, she filed a lawsuit against QEP in violation of the Equal Pay Act. Legal Issues Presented in This Case One of the legal issues presented in this case is the Equal Pay/Compens

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

MHR 6401
Riser v. QEP Energy
Columbia Southern University
MHR 6401, Employment Law

Riser v. QEP Energy
Ms. Kathy Riser worked for the company Questar Exploration and Production (Questar).

She began her employment in 1997 and held the position of Administration Services

Representative II. On July 1, 2010 QEP was spun off from Questar and became its own

independent company (Walsh, 2019). Ms. Riser remained with the company and continued her

duties. On September 8, 2011, Ms. Riser was terminated from the company. From the date of

the spun off until her termination, Ms. Riser had submitted numerous requests for pay raises due

to the increase of her duties. Her requests were denied and after her termination, she filed a

lawsuit against QEP in violation of the Equal Pay Act.

Legal Issues Presented in This Case

One of the legal issues presented in this case is the Equal Pay/Compensation

discrimination. When the QEP spun off occurred Ms. Riser received $22.11 per hour, in March

2011 she received a pay increase to $22.78, or $47,382 annualized (Walsh, 2019). QEP

developed a pay classification system which consisted of 15 different grades, and Ms. Riser was

classified as a 5 (Walsh, 2019). In addition, to the responsibilities Ms. Riser performed as

Administration Services Representative she also performed additional duties that are not

common under her position. Ms. Riser asked her supervisor for a change in title and salary

which was never answered. Due to a large amount of overtime hours, a new position was created

by QEP. Ms. Riser provide her supervisor a description of her responsibilities which was then

used as the job description for the opening. QEP then categorized this position as a Grade 7,

with an annual salary of $62,000 (Walsh, 2019). In June 2011, QEP hired a male for this

position with the advertised salary. After Ms. Riser’s termination from the company QEP hired

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 juli 2021
Aantal pagina's
3
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$7.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
helperatsof1 Wgu
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2532
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
2045
Documenten
7896
Laatst verkocht
5 dagen geleden
Best class tutorials

Well written guides to enhance your learning potential

4.0

441 beoordelingen

5
224
4
89
3
56
2
31
1
41

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen