Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

student summary

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
39
Geüpload op
06-09-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Summary study book Fundamentals of Social Research Methods of Claire Bless, Craig Higson-Smith, Sello Levy Sithole - ISBN: 9780702186837 (chapter 1-10)

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

PSYCHOLOGY 242

Chapter 1
R\ship= relationship.
Fundamentals of Social Research Methods



The different methods of acquiring knowledge

 For society to progress new knowledge is developed.
 Scientists create a set question that they intend to utilize to find answers to gain knowledge and
help understand ourselves and our environment.
 They find these questions with systemic rational thought and observation.
 Epistemology –the study of ways of knowing about the world.



Non-scientific methods.



Method of authority.

 When using this method people trust the knowledge and experience of the important people.

E.g., Trusting in the elderly, kings, political leaders& parents.

Critique: this method enables one to hide the power of their knowledge, its underlying ideologies, and
their weakness in judgment.

Mystical method

 People seek knowledge by referring to individuals who are socially or politically defined as
qualified producers of knowledge.

i.e., people in certain villages, including kings, depend on the traditional healers because of their
experience.

Intuitive method

 People reason based on their gut about certain occasions.
 Though they may struggle to express their gut, they believe that following them will positively
benefit them.

Critique: This method solely depends on one's individual experiences and beliefs as people may reach
different conclusions in the same situation.

Conventional wisdom

 All general knowledge or beliefs are accepted

,Critique of non-scientific methods-There is no way of telling which statement is accurate as they all give
reasoning and observation.

Contrasting methods
Rationalistic method

 This method is based on human reasoning and logic
 As they are believed to have the ability to think logically, that enables us to discover laws
through purely intellectual processes.
 Also allows us to know what must be true by principles I.e., in pure math where laws and
principles are discovered without reality but axioms.
 is used to create theories about the world.

Critique: Though this method has made a lot of progress in Natural science field it has made little
progress in the social science field.

Empirical method

 Only facts that are observed in nature are the foundation of knowledge.
 Opposite of the rationalistic method.
 One can only ground their knowledge based on what they can see.
 It is used to test theories about the world.

Scientific method and its properties.

 A knowing process which is a combination of rationalistic and empirical methods.
 which utilizes rationalism to develop theories and use empiricism to test them.



Two types of science knowledge's
 A priori knowledge
 This is the knowledge for earlier before experience.
 Does not depend on the experience.
 A posteriori
 The knowledge we post the experience.
 It depends on the experience or empirical evidence.
Two types of research conducted under scientific methods.
Quantitative research
 Type of research involves using statistical methods to analyze data.
 When conducting quantitative research, the following steps are to be followed.
Step 1

,  Describe the object, relationship, or situation. Moreover, the object of the study must
be well represented using empirical methods.
I.e. Seeth acts like a snob.
Step 2
 An explanation or statement about the relationship between then described facts
should be revealed using rationalistic methods.
I.e., This is because she is wealthy.
Step 3
 A prediction of future events under the defined conditions should be permitted by the
stated explanation.
I.e., if her wealth is taken away, she would act like anyone else.
Step 4
 An intelligent intervention is conducted based on correct explanation leading to the
ability to predict events.
I.e., process of removing her wealth Is carried out causing her to act like any other person
which proves that her money was the problem.


Qualitative research
 Research that includes collections and analyzing non-numerical data.
i.e., text, video, or audio.
 The researcher emphasizes observations and recording of events.
I.e., with Seeth the researcher will want to get to know her and experience the lives of the
affluent.
 No priori explanations are given but a posterior at the end.
 No predictions or explanations can be tested.
Science assumptions
1.The existence of natural and social laws.
2. These Laws can be discovered by human beings
3.Natural phenomena have natural causes

,  Scientific understanding is based on parsimony of ideas: explanations for phenomena
are based on as few assumptions as possible, they are to be as simple as possible
4. New knowledge is accumulated gradually and sequentially.
5.Knowledge and truth are founded on evidence (DATA)
6. Scientific statements must be distinguished from common-sense statements
7. Scientific observation is objective
8. Scientific observation is systematic
NB
 Often some characteristics are unknown
 Can only predict an event when ALL conditions and circumstances are known
 In social sciences it is rare to possess all information
 Probability statement: if some conditions are satisfied the event will occur more often
than if some of these conditions were not met
 Probabilistic explanation: Explanations that concede some uncertainty


Characteristics of scientific research
Scientific research is:
1.Empirical – each step is based on observation
2.Systematic and logical – observation must be done systematically, and a logical order
followed.
3.Replicable and transmittable – anyone placed in the same circumstances can observe the
same event and by reasoning, arrive at the same explanation and prediction.


The Relationship between theory and research
Deduction
 Going from the general to the specific
 Using general principles to suggest specific outcomes
Induction
 Going from the specific to the general
 Using several specific observations to formulate general principles

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
6 september 2021
Aantal pagina's
39
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$5.84
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
sesethuntamnani

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
sesethuntamnani Stellenbosch University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
1
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen