PHIL347 WEEK3 CHECKPOINT QUIZ

PHILQuestion 1 5 / 5 pts According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Your Answer: According to the textbook, the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development because critical thinkers are inquisitive truth0seekers that approach context and situations with a healthy sense of skepticism. Also, A strong critical thinker will initiate their own analysis and dig deeper to find clarity in the meaning. Additionally, critical thinkers are ranked "sages" and "truth-seekers" on the level of thinking and knowledge. An individual with expertise can be viewed as an authority. Nonetheless, an individual who is potentially a trustworthy source of information can be referred to as an authority figure. Whereas in the earlier stages of cognitive development, an example of authority to a child would be their parents, guardians, teachers, grandparents. With that mindset, the level of thinking and knowing, such as "touchers" and "trusters" will take any word from the authority at face value and without question trust what is being said. Question 2 5 / 5 pts Briefly, in your own words, state how the text defines “expert.” Your Answer: In my own words, the definition of "expert" in our text is defined as a person who has thoroughly achieved a profound experience and understanding of a skill or context they can demonstrate with confidence and clarity and it can be utilized in the field of work. This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :16:45 GMT -06:00 This study resource was shared via CourseH Question 3 5 / 5 pts When presented with a claim unsupported by reasons (for example, “the health risks of vaping have been underestimated”), what three options does a critical thinker have to evaluate such a claim? Your Answer: The three options that a critical thinker has to evaluate when presented with a claim unsupported by reason are as follows: 1. Evaluate the substance 2. Evaluate the source 3. Obtain an independent verification Question 4 5 / 5 pts Is the following statement true or untrue? Explain your answer. “If a claim cannot be confirmed by an independent investigation, then it must be false.” Your Answer: "If a claim cannot be confirmed by an independent investigation, then it must be false" is a false statement. If a claim cannot be confirmed by independent investigation, the individual doing the independent investiga347 WEEK3 CHECKPOINT QUIZ