Exam (elaborations) TEST BANK FOR Probability and Stochastic Processes A Friendly Introduction for Electrical and Computer Engineers 2nd Edition By Roy D. Yates, David Goodman (Solution Manual)

Roy D. Yates, David J. Goodman, David Famolari September 28, 2005 • This solution manual remains under construction. The current count is that 678 (out of 687) problems have solutions. The unsolved problems are 12.1.7, 12.1.8, 12.5.8, 12.5.9, 12.11.5 – 12.11.9. If you volunteer a solution for one of those problems, we’ll be happy to include it . . . and, of course, “your wildest dreams will come true.” • Of course, the correctness of every single solution reamins unconfirmed. If you find errors or have suggestions or comments, please send email: . • If you need to make solution sets for your class, you might like the Solution Set Constructor at the instructors site . • Matlab functions written as solutions to homework problems can be found in the archive (available to instructors) or in the directory matsoln. Other Matlab functions used in the text or in these homework solutions can be found in the archive or directory matcode. The .m files in matcode are available for download from the Wiley website. Two other documents of interest are also available for download: – A manual describing the matcode .m functions is also available. – The quiz solutions manual . • A web-based solution set constructor for the second edition is available to instructors at • The next update of this solution manual is likely to occur in January, 2006. 1 Problem Solutions – Chapter 1 Problem 1.1.1 Solution Based on the Venn diagram M O T the answers are fairly straightforward: (a) Since T ∩M = φ, T and M are not mutually exclusive. (b) Every pizza is either Regular (R), or Tuscan (T). Hence R ∪ T = S so that R and T are collectively exhaustive. Thus its also (trivially) true that R ∪ T ∪M = S. That is, R, T and M are also collectively exhaustive. (c) From the Venn diagram, T and O are mutually exclusive. In words, this means that Tuscan pizzas never have onions or pizzas with onions are never Tuscan. As an aside, “Tuscan” is a fake pizza designation; one shouldn’t conclude that people from Tuscany actually dislike onions. (d) From the Venn diagram, M∩T and O are mutually exclusive. Thus Gerlanda’s doesn’t make Tuscan pizza with mushrooms and onions. (e) Yes. In terms of the Venn diagram, these pizzas are in the set (T ∪M ∪ O)c. Problem 1.1.2 Solution Based on the Venn diagram, M O T the complete Gerlandas pizza menu is • Regular without toppings • Regular with mushrooms • Regular with onions • Regular with mushrooms and onions • Tuscan without toppings • Tuscan with mushrooms Problem 1.2.1 Solution (a) An outcome specifies whether the fax is high (h), medium (m), or low (l) speed, and whether the fax has two (t) pages or four (f) pages. The sample space is S = {ht, hf,mt,mf, lt, lf} . (1) 2 (b) The event that the fax is medium speed is A1 = {mt,mf}. (c) The event that a fax has two pages is A2 = {ht,mt, lt}. (d) The event that a fax is either high speed or low speed is A3 = {ht, hf, lt, lf}. (e) Since A1 ∩ A2 = {mt} and is not empty, A1, A2, and A3 are not mutually exclusive. (f) Since A1 ∪ A2 ∪ A3 = {ht, hf,mt,mf, lt, lf} = S, (2) the collection A1, A2, A3 is collectively exhaustive. Problem 1.2.2 Solution (a) The sample space of the experiment is S = {aaa, aaf, afa, faa, ffa, faf, aff, fff} . (1) (b) The event that the circuit from Z fails is ZF = {aaf, aff, faf, fff} . (2) The event that the circuit from X is acceptable is XA = {aaa, aaf, afa, aff} . (3) (c) Since ZF ∩ XA = {aaf, aff} = φ, ZF and XA are not mutually exclusive. (d) Since ZF ∪XA = {aaa, aaf, afa, aff, faf, fff} = S, ZF and XA are not collectively exhaustive. (e) The event that more than one circuit is acceptable is C = {aaa, aaf, afa, faa} . (4) The event that at least two circuits fail is D = {ffa, faf, aff, fff} . (5) (f) Inspection shows that C ∩ D = φ so C and D are mutually exclusive. (g) Since C ∪ D = S, C and D are collectively exhaustive. Problem 1.2.3 Solution The sample space is S = {A♣, . . . , K♣,A♦, . . . , K♦,A♥, . . . , K♥,A♠, . . . , K♠} . (1) The event H is the set H = {A♥, . . . , K♥} . (2) 3 Problem 1.2.4 Solution The sample space is S = ⎧⎨ ⎩ 1/1 . . . 1/31, 2/1 . . . 2/29, 3/1 . . . 3/31, 4/1 . . . 4/30, 5/1 . . . 5/31, 6/1 . . . 6/30, 7/1 . . . 7/31, 8/1 . . . 8/31, 9/1 . . . 9/31, 10/1 . . . 10/31, 11/1 . . . 11/30, 12/1 . . . 12/31 ⎫⎬ ⎭. (1) The event H defined by the event of a July birthday is described by following 31 sample points. H = {7/1, 7/2, . . . , 7/31} . (2) Problem 1.2.5 Solution Of course, there are many answers to this problem. Here are four event spaces. 1. We can divide students into engineers or non-engineers. Let A1 equal the set of engineering students and A2 the non-engineers. The pair {A1,A2} is an event space. 2. We can also separate students by GPA. Let Bi denote the subset of students with GPAs G satisfying i − 1 ≤ G i. At Rutgers, {B1,B2, . . . , B5} is an event space. Note that B5 is the set of all students with perfect 4.0 GPAs. Of course, other schools use different scales for GPA. 3. We can also divide the students by age. Let Ci denote the subset of students of age i in years. At most universities, {C10, C11, . . . , C100} would be an event space. Since a university may have prodigies either under 10 or over 100, we note that {C0, C1, . . .} is always an event space 4. Lastly, we can categorize students by attendance. Let D0 denote the number of students who have missed zero lectures and let D1 denote all other students. Although it is likely that D0 is an empty set, {D0,D1} is a well defined event space. Problem 1.2.6 Solution Let R1 and R2 denote the measured resistances. The pair (R1,R2) is an outcome of the experiment. Some event spaces include 1. If we need to check that neither resistance is too high, an event space is A1 = {R1 100,R2 100}, A2 = {either R1 ≥ 100 or R2 ≥ 100} . (1) 2. If we need to check whether the first resistance exceeds the second resistance, an event space is B1 = {R1 R2} B2 = {R1 ≤ R2} . (2) 3. If we need to check whether each resistance doesn’t fall below a minimum value (in this case 50 ohms for R1 and 100 ohms for R2), an event space is C1 = {R1 50,R2 100}, C2 = {R1 50,R2 ≥ 100} , (3) C3 = {R1 ≥ 50,R2 100}, C4 = {R1 ≥ 50,R2 ≥ 100} . (4) 4. If we want to check whether the resistors in parallel are within an acceptable range of 90 to 110 ohms, an event space is D1 =  (1/R1 + 1/R2)−1 90  , (5) D2 =  90 ≤ (1/R1 + 1/R2)−1 ≤ 110  , (6) D2 =  110 (1/R1 + 1/R2)−1 . (7) 4 Problem 1.3.1 Solution The sample space of the experiment is S = {LF,BF,LW,BW} .