DeVry University, ChicagoNETW 420NETW-420 - Week 7 - Shawn Stark.docx

Bi-Weekly Project Week 7 Bi-Weekly Project Week 7 Shawn R. Stark DeVry University Author Note This project paper was prepared for NETW-420 taught by Professor F. Afzal Bi-Weekly Project Week #: 7 This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :09:49 GMT -06:00 Bi-Weekly Project Week 7 Bi-Weekly Project Week 7 The following report discusses several aspects of network management. First, we discuss routing tables both with and without tunnels on a MPLS network. Second, we discuss the differences in topology, upstream protocols, and downstream protocols between an HFC coaxial broadband LAN and a regular Ethernet LAN. Third, and finally, we discuss QoS, latency, and jitter. The network shown in Figure 12.44 is an MPLS network with all routers configured as Label-Switching Routers (LSRs). The paths (LSPs) are determined using TE (Traffic Engineering). Fill in the R2 routing table (a) for paths with no tunnels Destination Interface Next Hop Metric 1.1.1.1 I1 1.1.1.1 1 5.5.5.5 I5 5.5.5.5 1 3.3.3.3 I3 3.3.3.3 1 4.4.4.4 I3 3.3.3.3 2 6.6.6.6 I5 5.5.5.5 2 (b) for paths with tunnels T1 and T2. Destination Interface Next Hop Metric 1.1.1.1 I1 1.1.1.1 1 5.5.5.5 I5 5.5.5.5 1 3.3.3.3 I3 3.3.3.3 1 4.4.4.4 T1 4.4.4.4 3/1 6.6.6.6 I5 5.5.5.5 2 Cable modems on the coaxial part of the topology of an HFC con