LEVEL 3 CRIMINOLOGY MARK RECORD SHEET
UNIT: 1. Changing Awareness of Crime
Centre name: Stourbridge College [part of Birmingham Metropolitan] Centre no: 20562 Candidate
Declaration
Candidate name: Candidate no:
NOTICE TO CANDIDATE
The work you submit for assessment must be your own.
If you copy from someone else, allow another candidate to copy from you, or if you cheat in any other way, you may be disqualified from at least the
subject concerned.
I have read and understood the Notice to Candidate (above). I have produced the attached work without assistance beyond that allowed.
Candidate’s Signature: ................................................................................ Date: 15/01/16
Declaration by Assessor:
The assignment brief used for summative assessment is attached, together with evidence of quality assurance.
I confirm that the evidence submitted by the learner has been produced under the controlled conditions set out in the qualification specification and model
assignment.
Assessor Name: (Please print) Isa Darby Signature: ................................................................. Date: ........
Lead Assessor Declaration:
I confirm that the evidence submitted by this learner for summative assessment has been quality assured and the grade awarded is confirmed as accurate.
Lead Assessor Name:(Please print) Isa Darby Signature: .................................................................. Date: .......
Overall marks awarded for this unit: 89
,Unit 1 Criminology Assessment – Changing Awareness of Crime
Assessment Mark Bands Marks
Criteria Mark Band 1 Mark Band 2 Mark Band 3 Mark Band 4 Awarded
AC1.1 Analyse Describes types of Analysis of types of 4 marks
different types of crime using crime using a range
crime example/s. of relevant examples.
(1-2) (3-4)
Assessor Analysis of types of crime using a range of relevant examples has been done, with reference to typical
comments victims and offenders and use of some source material and reference to the scenario. Some use of real
life cases could have been used, including those outlined in the appendix items provided, but this does
not undermine the content shown, which does cover the criterion requirements
AC1.2 Explain Reasons for Clear and detailed 2 marks
the reasons that unreported crimes are explanation of the
why certain limited in explanation reasons why a range
crimes are with few relevant of crimes are
unreported examples. unreported, using
relevant examples.
(1-2) (3-4)
Assessor Reasons for unreported crimes are limited in explanation with few relevant examples. See
comments assessor’s annotated notes in body of the assessment.
AC1.3 Explain Limited explanation Clear and detailed 4 marks
the (may only list explanation (includes
consequences of examples) of the relevant examples) of
unreported crime consequences of the consequences of
unreported crime. unreported crime.
(1-2) (3-4)
Assessor Overall, a good answer that relates to at least three clear consequences of not reporting crime, with reference to
comments theories and evidence from sources. At least one consequence has been mentioned in the student’s section for
AC1.6 but relates to AC1.3.
, Unit 1 Criminology Assessment – Changing Awareness of Crime
Assessment Mark Bands Marks
Criteria Mark Band 1 Mark Band 2 Mark Band 3 Mark Band 4 Awarded
AC1.4 Describe Limited description of Detailed description 4 marks
media the media of the media
representation of representation of representation of
crime crime. crime including
relevant examples.
(1-3) (4-6)
Assessor Reasonably detailed description of the media representation of crime that includes relevant research examples but
comments could have included real life Media examples too.
AC1.5 Explain Limited explanation of Clear and detailed 6 marks
the impact of the impact of media explanation of the
media representations on impact of a range of
representations the public perception media
on the public of crime. representations on
perception of the public perception
crime of crime.
(1-3) (4-6)
Assessor The impact of a range of media representations on the public perception of crime has been
comments explained well with reference to theoretical ideas, such as those of Stanley Cohen, and to
statistical evidence to support points made.