pvl3701 tut multiple choice. Combined tut. 100% VERIFIED.

pvl3701 tut multiple choice. Combined tut. 100% VERIFIED. PVL3701/201/1/2018 Tutorial Letter 201/1/2018 Property Law PVL3701 Semester 1 Department of Private Law This tutorial letter contains important information about this module. Bar code 2 CONTENTS 1. EXAMINATION INFORMATION 2. COMMENTARY ON ASSIGNMENT 01 FIRST SEMESTER 2018 3. COMMENTARY ON ASSIGNMENT 02 FIRST SEMESTER 2018 4. CORRECTIONS – NEW STUDY GUIDE 5. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Dear Student This tutorial letter contains information on the examination and commentary on Assignments 01 and 02 for the first semester. We trust that this tutorial letter will assist you in your studies. Please contact us if you have any queries or experience problems with this module. Yours sincerely PROF MITZI WIESE / DR BOITUMELO MMUSINYANE MR LEFA NTSOANE PVL3701/201 3 1 EXAMINATION INFORMATION  This is the last tutorial letter that you will receive this semester.  The examination paper consists of two sections: o Section 1 (40 marks out of 100 marks) of your examination paper will consist of multiple choice questions. Examples of multiple choice questions can be found in your compulsory assignment 02. o The questions in Section 2 (60 marks out of 100 marks) of the examination paper will be similar to the activities in your Study Guide.  Make sure that you study ALL the work in the Study Guide, as well as the cases listed in tutorial letter 101/3/2018 (p 7) namely: o Ex parte Geldenhuys 1926 OPD 155 o MacDonald Ltd v Radin NO and the Potchefstroom Dairies and Industries Co Ltd o Info Plus v Scheelke 1998 (3) SA 184 (SCA)1915 AD 454 o Nino Bonino v De Lange 1906 TS 120 o Telkom SA Ltd v Xsinet (Pty) Ltd 2003 (5) SA 309 (SCA) o Willoughby’s Consolidated Co Ltd v Copthall Stores Ltd 1913 AD 267 o Grant v Stonestreet 1968 (4) SA 1 (A) o Mapenduka v Ashington 1919 AD 33 o First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service: First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Minister of Finance 2002 4 SA 768 (CC) (also reported at [2002] 7 BCLR 702 (CC)) 4 Please remember that all other cases to which we refer in the Study Guide should be studied to the extent that they are discussed in the Study Guide.  Take note of the mark allocation in Tutorial letter 101/3/2018 (p 9) inserted below for ease of reference. This will be very helpful in your preparation for the examination. Part 1 (study units 1-2): Introduction, things as legal objects and real rights and personal rights (10%) Part 2 (study units 3-7): Ownership: definition of, limitations on, original acquisition of, derivative acquisition of, protection of, termination of and coownership (40%) Part 3 (study units 8-9): Possession and holdership: nature of, protection of and termination of (15%) Part 4 (study units 10-12): Limited real rights: introduction, servitudes, restrictive conditions, pledge, security by means of claims, mortgage, tacit mortgages, mineral rights, water rights and tenant’s rights (25%) Part 5 (study units 13-15): Constitutional property law, land reform and additional forms of statutory land use (10%) PVL3701/201 5 2 COMMENTARY ON ASSIGNMENT 01 UNIQUE ASSIGNMENT NUMBER: Before you answer the questions of this assignment, work through Study Units 1-9 very carefully. In Study Unit 1 we introduce you to three real relationships, namely:  ownership  possession and  holdership The definition, limitation, acquisition, protection and termination of ownership are dealt with in Study Units 3-6. Study Unit 7 deals with co-ownership. The nature, protection and termination of possession and holdership are discussed in Study Units 8 and 9. QUESTION 1 (a) Can it be said that ownership is an “unrestricted right”? Substantiate your answer. (3) ANSWER No, ownership is not unrestricted. (1) [A mark is awarded for this answer only if it is substantiated correctly.] Ownership can be defined as the most comprehensive real right that a person can have with regards to his/her thing. In principle, a person can act upon and with his/her thing as he/she pleases. This apparent freedom is restricted, however by the law (1) and the rights of others (1). Ownership can be limited in the following ways: