Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

NR 503 Week 2 Discussion: Epidemiological Methods | Download To Score An A

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
1
Geüpload op
31-01-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Consider one of the following disease processes: Zika Salmonella MRSA → Selected Disease Clostridioides difficile Depression (Choose population:Adult, Older Adult, Adolescent) Attention Defi cit Disorder Dementia Osteoporosis Next, choose a diagnostic or screening method. You may use one of the following web sites to locate a screening tool, a scholarly article, or a tool from a professional web site of your choice (for example, from the American Psychological Association).: U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (Links to an external site.) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. SAMHSA-HRSA (Links to an external site.). Reply to the following prompt: Describe the diagnostic or screening tool selected, its purpose, and what age group it targets. Has it been specifically tested in this age group? Next, discuss the predictive ability of the test. For instance, how do you know the test is reliable and valid? What are the reliability and validity values? What are the predictive values? Is it sensitive to measure what it has been developed to measure, for instance, HIV, or depression in older adults, or Lyme Disease? Would you integrate this tool into your advanced practice based on the information you have read about the test, why or why not? Need assistance? Click here for the Week 2 FAQ document that discusses these terms. You should include a minimum of two (2) scholarly articles from the last five (5) years (3 is recommended). Respond to a minimum of two (2) individuals, peer and/or faculty, with a scholarly and reflective post of a minimum of two (2) paragraphs of 4-5 sentences. A minimum of one (1) scholarly article should … utilized to support the post in addition to your textbook. Your work should have in-text citations integrating at a minimum one scholarly article and the course textbook. APA format should … utilized to include a reference list. Correct grammar, spelling, and APA should … adhered to when writing, work should … scholarly without personalization or first person use. Show Less

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NR503: Population Health, Epidemiology, & Statistical Principles
Week 2: Epidemiology and Biostatistics to Inform Advanced Practice
Nursing
TD3: Please provide a summary of the case or information you have
discussed this week
The ability to classify individuals into the correct disease status depends on
the quality, and accuracy of the screening or the diagnostic test. Ideally, a
good screening test will be able to tell us which subjects have the disease
and vice versa, which will lead to earlier treatment and that this, in turn, will
lead to a better outcome. The ideal screening test must also be valid and
reliable. The validity of a test is defined as its ability to distinguish between
who has a disease and who does not (Gordis, 2014 p, 88). An ideal screening
test is exquisitely sensitive (high probability of identifying correctly those
who have the disease) and extremely specific (high probability that those
without the disease will screen negative). If a test is reliable, it gives
consistent results with repeated tests.
When evaluating the feasibility or the success of a screening program, one
should also consider the positive and negative predictive values. Positive
predictive value is the proportion of persons with a positive test that are true
positive actually have the disease (true positive) whereas negative predictive
value is the proportion of those who test negative who do not have (Gordis,
2014 p, 100). Predictive value of a test is an important issue. Physician used
it to enhance his/her ability to make a correct diagnosis. One needs to
consider what happens to the people who had a positive screening test but
turned out not to have the disease (false positives) and to the people who
had a negative screening test but turned out to have the disease (false
negatives).
Reference
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier




This study source was downloaded by 100000829957125 from CourseHero.com on 01-31-2022 09:16:19 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/18376078/NR503-week-2-TD3/

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
31 januari 2022
Aantal pagina's
1
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
OVERIG
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

$11.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
EliteStudyDocs Rasmussen College
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
3560
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
2868
Documenten
9036
Laatst verkocht
20 uur geleden
High Quality Exams, Study guides, Reviews, Notes, Case Studies

Welcome to EliteStudyDocs, your ultimate destination for high-quality, verified study materials trusted by students, educators, and professionals across the globe. I specialize in providing A+ graded exam files, practice questions, complete study guides, and certification prep tailored to a wide range of academic and professional fields. P/S: CHECK OUT THE PACKAGE DEALS

4.0

697 beoordelingen

5
383
4
127
3
77
2
39
1
71

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen