Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Sepsis/Septic Shock RAPID Reasoning Case Study STUDENT

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
28
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-02-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Sepsis/Septic Shock RAPID Reasoning Case Study STUDENT

Institution
Course

Content preview

Sepsis/Septic Shock
RAPID Reasoning Case Study
STUDENT




Jack Holmes, 72 years old

Primary Concept
Perfusion
Interrelated Concepts (In order of emphasis)
• Inflammation
• Infection
• Tissue Integrity
• Clinical Judgment
• Patient Education
• Communication
NCLEX Client Need Categories Percentage of Items from Each Covered in
Category/Subcategory Case Study
Safe and Effective Care Environment
✓ Management of Care 17-23%
✓ Safety and Infection Control 9-15%
Health Promotion and Maintenance 6-12%
Psychosocial Integrity 6-12%
Physiological Integrity
✓ Basic Care and Comfort 6-12%
✓ Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies 12-18%
✓ Reduction of Risk Potential 9-15%
✓ Physiological Adaptation 11-17%

Copyright © 2018 Keith Rischer, d/b/a KeithRN. All Rights reserved.

,History of Present Problem:
Jack Holmes a 72-year-old Caucasian male brought to the ED by ambulance from a skilled nursing facility (SNF).
According to report from the paramedic, when the SNF nursing staff attempted to wake him this morning, he would not
respond, and his BP was 74/40 with a MAP of 51. He has a history of Parkinson’s disease, COPD, CHF, HTN,
depression, and a stage IV decubitus ulcer on his coccyx that developed three months ago. He does not follow
commands, is unresponsive to verbal stimuli, but responds to a sternal rub with grimacing and withdrawing from
stimulus.

Personal/Social History:
He has lived in the skilled nursing facility the past three years and has been bed bound the past year due to his advanced
Parkinson’s disease. He was a heavy smoker, 1 PPD for 40 years until he moved to the SNF.

What data from the histories are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse?
(Reduction of Risk Potential)
RELEVANT Data from Present Problem: Clinical Significance:
Low BP with MAP of 51 Hypoperfusion of the tissue which can hinder
oxygenation
Stage 4 Ulcer on his coccyx
that developed 3 months Ulcer not healing due to inadequate tissue
ago perfusion

COPD, CHF, HTN, Altered immune response due to these
Parkinson’s disease and comorbidities and lowered functioning immune
old age system given the patient’s age.

Unresponsiveness to verbal Altered LOC
stimuli
RELEVANT Data from Social History: Clinical Significance:
Skilled Nursing Facility More exposure to pathogens or iatrogenic
illness at the facility

Bed bound due to his Poor skin integrity, atrophy of muscle, renal
Parkinson’s calculi, DVT, isolation

Depression Isolation, no interest or motivation in
performing
ADL’s, unable to self-advocate, withdrawing
from peers


Patient Care Begins
Current VS: P-Q-R-S-T Pain Assessment:
T: 103.4 F/39.7 C (oral) Provoking/Palliative: Not responsive verbally, withdraws to pain, no other indicators of
pain
P: 135 (irregular) Quality:
R: 32 (regular) Region/Radiation:
BP: 76/39 MAP: 51 Severity:
O2 sat: 91% 2 liters n/c Timing:

, What VS data are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse?
(Reduction of Risk Potential/Health Promotion and Maintenance)
RELEVANT VS Data: Clinical Significance:
Temperature is There is an active infection in the body, this can also cause
high higher metabolism which can lead to fatigue

Respiration is Compensating for low BP in order to adequately oxygenate
high the tissues

BP is low
This is an indication of septic shock
O2 Sat is low
(91%)
Could be normal for a patient with COPD who is a heavy
former smoker with a history of 1 PPD for 40 years.

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 3, 2022
Number of pages
28
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$13.50
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
10SALES South University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
228
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
210
Documents
2685
Last sold
2 months ago

3.6

39 reviews

5
16
4
10
3
2
2
3
1
8

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions