Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MTH 216T Quantitative Reasoning II Week 5 Final Exam- University of Phoenix

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Grade
A
Uploaded on
21-02-2022
Written in
2021/2022

MTH 216T Quantitative Reasoning II Week 5 Final Exam- University of Phoenix/MTH 216T Quantitative Reasoning II Week 5 Final Exam- University of Phoenix/MTH 216T Quantitative Reasoning II Week 5 Final Exam- University of Phoenix

Institution
Course

Content preview

MTH/216T: Quantitative Reasoning II Week 5 Final Exam

Question 1
What is the average?
3458

1.
2

2.
4

3.
5

4.
10
2.
Question 2
What is the median of these figure skating ratings?
6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 9.0

1.
6.0

2.
7.0

3.
7.1

4.
8.0
3.
Question 3
Two owners of a cattle ranch, Jo and Val, want to find the average weight for the ranch’s
200 cows. Instead of weighing all of the cows:
Jo weighs 25 cows and gets an average weight of 1,350 pounds (stdev 50)
Val weighs 100 cows and gets an average weight of 1,420 pounds (stdev 50)

What is Jo’s margin of error, rounded to the nearest whole number? (The formula is


)

1.
10

2.



This study source was downloaded by 100000817935606 from CourseHero.com on 02-21-2022 07:27:02 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/62068822/MTH216T-Quantitative-Reasoning-II-Week-5-Final-Examdocx/

, 20

3.
50

4.
529
4.
Question 4
A media personality argues that global temperatures are not rising, because every year
an increase is reported such as 0.08 degrees C. The difference from the previous year is
less than the margin of error of about 0.15 degrees C, so that difference should be
ignored. What is a strong counterargument?

1.
Even 0.08 degrees is a lot and thus should be considered.

2.
The margin of error is just extra information and thus can be ignored.

3.
The difference with any previous decade is much greater than the margin of error.

4.
0.15 - 0.08 is 0.07, which is still an increase and thus should be considered.
5.
Question 5
An article reports that blue eyed people earn less than brown eyed people, with these
numbers: average blue-eyed salary $35,000, average brown-eyed salary $37,000, p-
value 0.45. Based on that reported p-value, and using the common definition of
"statistical significance," which is the case?

1.
The results are nowhere near to being statistically significant.

2.
The results are almost but not quite statistically significant.

3.
The results are just barely statistically significant.

4.
The results are strongly statistically significant.
6.
Question 6
A group of 10 people is choosing a chairperson and vice-chairperson. They put all 10
people's names into a hat. The first name drawn becomes chair. The second name
drawn becomes vice-chair. How many possible combinations of chair and vice-chair are
there?



This study source was downloaded by 100000817935606 from CourseHero.com on 02-21-2022 07:27:02 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/62068822/MTH216T-Quantitative-Reasoning-II-Week-5-Final-Examdocx/

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 21, 2022
Number of pages
7
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$15.48
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Millenialnurse Freelance Tutor
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
252
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
147
Documents
1482
Last sold
2 days ago
Genuine Study Guides 2024

Holla me for assistance 24/7.

3.4

37 reviews

5
17
4
4
3
4
2
2
1
10

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions