Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case

Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
24-02-2022
Written in
2021/2022

PHI445 Week 4 Discussion, The Effects of Business on Consumers and the Environment: Case Study Perdue Farms Perdue prides themselves in the freshness of their chicken, stating that “we go beyond what the USDA requires with extra inspections in American family-owned farms, refrigerated trucks that deliver daily, and everywhere in between” (PerdueChicken, 2014). Out of all the chicken consumed in the United States, Perdue produces the most. They have approximately 9,900 concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) which produce approximately 80% of the meat consumed by Americans- averaging 270 pound per person every year (Fieser, 2015). Hoover (2013) explains that these massive facilities that confine large numbers of animals have taken over independent farms as the primary source of not only meat, but eggs and dairy as well in the U.S. Craig Watts debated taking action against Perdue concerning chickens being raised in inhumane conditions. He spoke up for the greater good and demonstrated moral freedom of not participating in practices that produced suffering. He states that “over the course of six weeks, in a house of 30,000 chickens, it's considered normal for more than 1,000 birds to die in every flock due to illness, genetic problems or other issues including injuries” (CompassionUSA, 2014). He even says that under his contract with Perdue, he is not allowed to give the chickens fresh air or even sunshine. The chickens are forced to sit in the feces of tens of thousands of birds; their litter containing the feces isn’t changed between flocks and sometimes not changed for years (CompassionUSA, 2014). These CAFOs also cause environmental concerns. Hoover (2013) states that they compare more to industrial manufacturing than farming because they emit large amounts of air pollutants that are harmful. Not only are they damaging the environment, but are causing public health distresses. “The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization finds the livestock sector to be one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems worldwide” (Hoover, 2013, p.5). He also goes on to explain that the primary cause of the pollution is the decomposing animal manure, “nitrous oxide results from microbial processes in manure, and has 296 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide” (Hoover, 2013, p.7). A two year EPA study found levels of pollutants at some CAFOs whose levels were far higher than federal health based guidelines recommend for human exposure. These undoubtedly cause negative effects for the surrounding environment and residents. As far as the regulations surrounding factory farming, “since animals raised for food production receive virtually no protection under federal law and only ineffective protection under state anti-cruelty laws,18 the regulation of their treatment is left to the farm industry itself” (Stathopoulos, 2010, p. 411). The FDA has the authority to regulate activities on farm sites to prevent unsafe food products; however the USDA doesn’t have authority to regulate the safety of food products on a farm level (Stathopoulos, 2010, p. 410). References: CompassionUSA. (2014, December 3). Chicken factory farmer speaks out [Video file]. Retrieved from Fieser, J. (2015). Introduction to business ethics [Electronic version]. Retrieved from Hoover, J. (2013). Can’t you smell that smell? Clean air act fixes for factory farm air pollution. Stanford Journal of Animal Law and Policy, 6, 1-29. Retrieved from PerdueChicken. (2014, August 1). Perdue cartoon commercial–Fresh taste [Video file]. Retrieved from Stathopoulos, A. S. (2010). You are what your food eats: How regulation of factory farm conditions could improve human health and animal welfare alike. Legislation and Public Policy, 13, 407-444. Retrieved from

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

PHI 445 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION

Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)
In the Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the problems that would be
discussed is based on pay discrimination due to gender. Over many years of career at
Goodyear Tire, Lilly Ledbetter was consistently given low rankings in annual
performance including salary reviews, and small raises when compared to other
employees. Ledbetter filed a discrimination charge against Goodyear for gender
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, affirming that the
organization had paid her a low salary due to her gender (Brake & Grossman, 2007).
Lilly Ledbetter was awarded over 3 million dollars in punitive damages. However, the
judge decreased the money to 360,000 per Title VII’s cap on damages (Brake &
Grossman, 2007). The Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. happened in
Gadsen, Alabama, United States (Bader, 2013). Capitalism economic system matches
this business since the organization is acting on what interests them not the interest of
the community, which motivates the business activity (Fieser, 2015). The laws that
govern or affect operations, in this case, is the Equal Pay of Act of 1963, which is also
part of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The law “prohibited sex-based wage
discrimination between men and women in the same workplace, who perform jobs that
require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility under the same working
conditions” (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission n.d, p.1).
Ethical Theory
The ethical theory that I chose to apply to the Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Co. is deontology. Immanuel Kant designed deontology theory, “which is a
moral principle that we should treat each person as an end, and merely as a means to
an end” (Fieser, 2015, sec. 1.3). The first characteristic of deontology is that we should
treat everyone “as beings with intrinsic value and regard them as highly as we would
our own happiness (Feiser, 2015, sec. 1.3). The second characteristic “is a single
instinctive principle of duty that we all should follow; the Golden Rule is the best
example of this. That is, I should do to others what I would want them to do to me”
(Fieser, 2015, Sect. 1.3).
When applying the ethical theory to the selected case above one can say that the
deontology theory, for instance, believes that persons should be treated as ends and
never used merely as means. The approach means that each human being has the
right to be treated as a liberated person equal to any other human being and that all
people have a correlative moral duty to treat each other as a free and the same person.
Discriminatory systems infringe the deontological theory in two forms. Firstly,
discrimination is based on the assumption that one population is low in rang to other
groups. Secondly, bias puts the groups that are discriminated against in lower social
and economic situations. For example, minorities and women have fewer employment
opportunities and are given lower salaries. Again, the privilege to be treated as a free
and equivalent individual is abused.
References

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 24, 2022
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
CASE
Professor(s)
Proff
Grade
A+

Subjects

$14.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
NURSEREP Rasmussen College
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
596
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
424
Documents
2676
Last sold
2 weeks ago
NURSEREP

On this page, you find all documents, package deals, and flashcards offered by seller NURSEREP

4.7

327 reviews

5
285
4
20
3
9
2
4
1
9

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions