Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CCEA Government and Politics Assessment Unit AS 2 assessing The British Political Process

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-02-2022
Geschreven in
2022/2023

CCEA Government and Politics Assessment Unit AS 2 assessing The British Political Process Section A: The UK Parliament and Executive 1 Two marks for each debate identified. Debates in the Commons include those on the First, Second and Third Readings, Adjournment Debates, Budget Debates, Emergency Debates. Terms such as ‘Parliamentary Debates’ or ‘Commons Debates’ are not acceptable. Any other relevant type of debate. (AO1: 4 marks) [4] 2 Background MPs can perform their scrutiny role in a wide variety of ways including asking questions of ministers, participating in both Select and Public Bill Committees, participating in debates, producing research findings, criticising policies through the media, using social media platforms, asking questions during Question Time. Any other relevant form of scrutiny. Level 1 ([1]) The student identifies a valid way with little or no development. Level 2 ([2]–[3]) The student offers a limited explanation of a valid way. There will be some supporting evidence. Level 3 ([4]–[5]) The student provides a full explanation of a valid way. Relevant evidence will support the response. Apply criteria for other relevant strength. (AO1: 2  5 marks) Any other valid material will be rewarded appropriately. (AO1: 10 marks) [10] 3 (a) Background It would, until the election of the Johnson government, appear ridiculous to argue that Prime Ministers dominate their cabinets. His immediate predecessors as PM have been obviously weak and lacking in control. However, students should take a longer perspective and be able to explain the argument of PM dominance and explain the reasons why this was, until recently, frequently advanced. It is anticipated that students will refer to the powers of the PM, including patronage powers, control over the frequency and agenda of Cabinet meetings, the ability to pre-cook policy in Cabinet Committees, the support of the PM’s Office and ready access to the media. These should be explained even if an answer then goes on to argue that they have all failed to rescue recent PMs. For balance, an answer could explain the reasons why Cabinet Government is still in operation, especially the significance of the size of a government’s majority. The personality of the PM is only one of a range of factors determining the PM’s ability to control cabinet. Weaker answers will be limited in terms of argument and especially evidence and will lack balance. Stronger answers will display understanding of the issues, be able to support this with evidence and be balanced in coverage of both sides of the debate. If an answer contains no evidence/examples, a maximum of Level 3 can be awarded. If an answer is totally unbalanced, a maximum of Level 4 can be awarded. Level 1 ([1]–[6]) Responses at this level are characterised by brevity, often being not more than a few paragraphs long and contain little or no relevant material. The student demonstrates little knowledge and understanding of the debate over whether Cabinet Government still exists and makes little attempt to answer the question. The answer is ill-informed and/or has a high degree of irrelevant material and/or makes general statements and/or has no evidence. There is little analysis and evaluation of information, arguments and explanations. The quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar is poor. An argument, if present, is ill-informed and poorly constructed and the level of communication and the use of political vocabulary are both rudimentary. Level 2 ([7]–[11])

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

ADVANCED SUBSIDIARY (AS)
General Certificate of Education




Government and Politics
Assessment Unit AS 2
assessing

The British Political
Process
[SGP21]




Assessment


MARK
SCHEME




12431.01

,General Marking Instructions

Introduction
The main purpose of the mark scheme is to ensure that papers are marked accurately,
consistently and fairly. The mark scheme provides teachers with an indication of the
nature and range of students’ responses likely to be worthy of credit. It also sets out the
criteria which they should apply in allocating marks to students’ responses.

Assessment objectives
Below are the assessment objectives for GCE Government and

Politics. Students should be able to:

AO1 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of political institutions,
processes, concepts, theories and debates.

AO2 Analyse and evaluate political information, arguments and theories;
identify parallels, connections, similarities and differences between the
political systems studied.

AO3 Construct and communicate coherent arguments making use of a range of
appropriate political vocabulary.

Not all AOs are assessed in every question. In shorter, factual recall questions only
AO1 may be assessed. In longer extended writing responses all three AOs may be
assessed.

Quality of students’ responses
In marking the examination papers, teachers should be looking for a quality of response
reflecting the level of maturity which may reasonably be expected of a 17 or 18-year-old
which is the age at which the majority of students sit their GCE examinations.

Flexibility in marking
Mark schemes are not intended to be totally prescriptive. No mark scheme can cover all
the responses which students may produce. In the event of unanticipated answers,
teachers are expected to use their professional judgement to assess the validity of
answers.

Positive marking
Teachers are encouraged to be positive in their marking, giving appropriate credit for what
students know, understand and can do rather than penalising students for errors or
omissions. Teachers should make use of the whole of the available mark range for any
particular question and be prepared to award full marks for a response which is as good as
might reasonably be expected of a 17 or 18-year-old GCE student.

Awarding zero marks
Marks should only be awarded for valid responses and no marks should be awarded
for an answer which is completely incorrect or inappropriate.

Examples and evidence
In a subject such as Government and Politics, the use of relevant examples and
evidence is crucial. However, the amount of evidence/examples required depends
upon the nature of the question.

• shorter, factual recall questions may require
12431.0 2 no evidence/examples at all.
1

, • other short questions may require an example is given but not developed.
• some source-based questions may identify an example and the task for students is to
identify and then explain this example (and usually provide another).




12431.0 3
1

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 februari 2022
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$15.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Amerit234 Yale University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
36
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
33
Documenten
259
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden
BRIANNA ACADEMICS

NURSING

3.8

8 beoordelingen

5
2
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen