Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

MAT 202 Two Independent Samples Checkpoint

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
A
Geüpload op
09-03-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

MAT 202 Two Independent Samples Checkpoint/MAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples CheckpointMAT 202 Two Independent Samples Checkpoint

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

4/5/2018 Two Independent Samples Checkpoint | Acrobatiq


CALL: (855) 836-4203 LIVE CHAT HELP CENTER MyLine Log Out



Tutoring (/lti_navigation_launch/sl_stats_v1/58eeb3630837637d7a50017a)



BACK TO COURSE (/COURSEWARE/PAGE/SL_STATS_V1/_U5_M02_TWO_INDEPENDENT_SAMPLES7)



MODULE INFERENCE FOR RELATIONSHIPS

TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES CHECKPOINT
Step 1 of 1



Question 1 of 5 Points: 10 out of 10


A teacher is experimenting with a new computer-based instruction and conducts a study to test its effectiveness. In which situation could the teacher
use the two-sample t-test for comparing two population means?



The teacher gives each student in the class a pretest. Then she teaches a lesson using a computer program. Afterwards, she gives each
student a post-test. The teacher wants to compare test scores for each student to see whether the data will show an improvement.

The teacher randomly divides the class into two groups. One of the groups receives computer-based instruction and the other group
receives traditional instruction without computers. After instruction, each student takes a test and the teacher wants to compare the
test scores of the two groups.

The teacher uses a combination of traditional methods and computer-based instruction. She asks students which they liked better. She
wants to determine if the majority prefer the computer-based instruction.

Good Job! Since students were randomized to two different groups the data obtained from this study should be analyzed
using the two (independent) samples t-test.




Question 2 of 5 Points: 10 out of 10


College Students and Drinking Habits: A public health official is studying differences in drinking habits among students at two different universities.
Th ll d l f d i d d l f h f h i ii d k
https://straighterline.acrobatiq.com/courseware/summative-assessment/sl_stats_v1/_u5_m2_two_indep_samples_checkpoint1/5ac6391f00000935c7790139 h d h l h li d i k h 1/5

, 4/5/2018 Two Independent Samples Checkpoint | Acrobatiq
They collect a random sample of students independently from each of the two universities and ask each student how many alcoholic drinks they
consumed in the previous week.




The official conducts a two-sample t-test to determine whether these data provide significant evidence that students at University 1 drink more than
students at University 2. The test statistic is t = 2.64 with a P-value 0.005.

Which of the following is an appropriate conclusion?



The samples provide significant evidence that students at University 1 drink more than students at University 2.

The samples do not provide statistically significant evidence.

We can not use the t-test in this case because the variables (number of drinks) are likely skewed to the right at each university.

Good job! A P-value this small indicates statistically significant results.




Question 3 of 5 Points: 10 out of 10


In a study of the impact of smoking on birth weight, researchers analyze birth weights (in grams) for babies born to 189 women who gave birth in
1989 at a hospital in Massachusetts. In the group, 74 of the women were categorized as “smokers” and 115 as “non-smokers.” The difference in the
two sample mean birth weights (non-smokers minus smokers) is 281.7 grams and the 95% confidence interval is (76.5, 486.9)

Which gives the best interpretation of what we can conclude about the impact of smoking on birth weight?



We are 95% confident that on average, smoking causes lower birth weights of between 76.5 grams to 486.9 grams.

There is a 95% chance that if a woman smokes during pregnancy her baby will weigh between 76.5 grams to 486.9 grams less than if she
did not smoke.

https://straighterline.acrobatiq.com/courseware/summative-assessment/sl_stats_v1/_u5_m2_two_indep_samples_checkpoint1/5ac6391f00000935c7790139 2/5

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
9 maart 2022
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$11.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Igatchu colombia university
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
10
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
8
Documenten
441
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden
Igatchu

course work available for nursing bio math etc, glad to assist Igatchu :)

5.0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen