Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

NR-511 Week 3 Clinical Case Study Part Two Discussion (Collection)graded A

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
19-03-2022
Written in
2021/2022

NR 511 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Part Two Now, assume that any procedures and/or testing which were performed are NORMAL. • What is your primary (one) diagnosis for this patient at this time? • Identify the corresponding ICD-10 code. • Provide a treatment plan for this patient's primary diagnosis which includes: o Medication* o Any additional testing necessary for this particular diagnosis* o Patient education o Referral and follow-up to the treatment plan • Provide an active problem list for this patient based on the information given in the case. *If part of the plan does not warrant an action, you must explain why. ALL medication and testing decisions (or decisions not to treat with medication or additional testing) MUST be supported with an evidence-based medicine (EBM) argument Answer: Week 3 Part 2

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Your text here 1




NR 511 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Part Two
Now, assume that any procedures and/or testing which were performed are NORMAL.

 What is your primary (one) diagnosis for this patient at this time?
 Identify the corresponding ICD-10 code.
 Provide a treatment plan for this patient's primary diagnosis which includes:
o Medication*
o Any additional testing necessary for this particular diagnosis*
o Patient education
o Referral and follow-up to the treatment plan
 Provide an active problem list for this patient based on the information given in the case.

*If part of the plan does not warrant an action, you must explain why. ALL medication and
testing decisions (or decisions not to treat with medication or additional testing) MUST be
supported with an evidence-based medicine (EBM) argument



Answer:
Week 3 Part 2
Addition to part 1 submission.
Other than visualizing the eyes and performing a vision test. Further diagnostic testing is not necessary
at this juncture since the patient is not reporting any vision abnormality and no foreign object was noted
on the fundoscopic exam. If further irritation or worsening occurs I would suggest a referral to an
ophthalmologist where they can perform a more in depth exam as well as other available diagnostic
screenings. I would however screen for allergens or IgE molecules to determine the causative factors by
both blood and skin testing (Maris, 2017).

In addition to causes of allergic conjunctiva; mast cells cause histamine to be released from the
aggravating allergen thus causing the presented symptoms (Maris, 2017).

Primary Diagnosis is allergic conjunctivitis (H10.45) with concurrent allergic rhinitis (J30.9) using
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 10 (ICD10, 2018). These diagnoses were chosen since it
can explain the majority of his presenting symptoms of nasal congestion, with reddened turbinate’s,
itchy watery eyes as well as feeling as there is a foreign object bilaterally. Allergic conjunctivitis and
allergic rhinitis generally go hand and hand when there is an exposure to allergens (Akerman, Smith &
Gomes, 2016).




This study source was downloaded by 100000839739811 from CourseHero.com on 03-19-2022 11:31:54 GMT -05:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/57423812/NR-511-Week-3-Clinical-Case-Study-Part-Two-Discussiondocx/

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 19, 2022
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$11.98
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EvaTee Phoenix University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5311
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
3571
Documents
57176
Last sold
11 hours ago
TIGHT DEADLINE? I CAN HELP

Many students don\'t have the time to work on their academic papers due to balancing with other responsibilities, for example, part-time work. I can relate. kindly don\'t hesitate to contact me, my study guides, notes and exams or test banks, are 100% graded

3.8

967 reviews

5
461
4
169
3
177
2
48
1
112

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions