LECTSTEPHEN
GOVT 407 Exam 3
• Question 1
0 out of 5 points
Phillips was injured using a riding lawnmower manufactured by Southern Tractor Company.
Phillips sues Southern alleging that it negligently designed the lawnmower. During discovery, he
sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents that includesa request for all written
documents showing the design of the mower. Southern objects to this request on the ground that it
is irrelevant. Is this objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 2
5 out of 5 points
When Phillips files suit, Southern raises the defense in its answer that Phillips’ failure toproperly
maintain the lawnmower led to his injuries. Southern sends interrogatories to Phillips inquiring
about how often he serviced the lawnmower before he sustained his injuries. Do these
interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 3
5 out of 5 points
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern inquiring whether other customers have been injured
while using the same Southern riding lawnmower. Do these interrogatories seek relevant
information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 4
5 out of 5 points
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern requesting emails from company employeesabout the
design of the lawnmower. Southern objects on the ground that such emailswould be
inadmissible “hearsay” at trial. Is the objection proper?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 5
5 out of 5 points
Phillips seeks compensatory damages for the injuries he sustained from the riding lawnmower.
Southern sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents to Phillipsseeking copies of all
medical bills related to the accident. Must Phillips produce them?
, Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 6
5 out of 5 points
Peach Computer Company files a lawsuit against MBI, Inc. alleging that MBI violated Peach’s
patent on a particular software program. Peach sends a Rule 34 Request for Production of
documents requesting every email that has ever been sent or received byan MBI employee. MBI
objects to the request on the ground that it is unduly burdensome. Is the objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 7
5 out of 5 points
Simpson files a lawsuit against Stuff Mart claiming that the company has engaged in a pattern of
sex discrimination by refusing to promote her and other women in the company due to their sex.
Simpson sends interrogatories to Stuff Mart asking how manywomen in the company have been
promoted within the past five years. Do these interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 8
0 out of 5 points
Titus sues Hamilton for injuries sustained in a boating accident. Titus alleges that Hamilton was
drunk at the time of accident. Hamilton hires a lawyer and tells him thathe had consumed ten
beers and was in fact drunk at the time of the accident. Titus sends interrogatories to Hamilton
asking how many drinks he had consumed before theaccident. Titus’s attorney objects to the
interrogatory based on the attorney-client privilege. Is the objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 9
0 out of 5 points
During Hamilton’s deposition, Titus asks him, “Did you tell your lawyer you had tenbeers
before the accident?” Titus’s lawyer objects to the question based on the attorney-client
privilege. Does the privilege apply to this question?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 10
0 out of 5 points
GOVT 407 Exam 3
• Question 1
0 out of 5 points
Phillips was injured using a riding lawnmower manufactured by Southern Tractor Company.
Phillips sues Southern alleging that it negligently designed the lawnmower. During discovery, he
sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents that includesa request for all written
documents showing the design of the mower. Southern objects to this request on the ground that it
is irrelevant. Is this objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 2
5 out of 5 points
When Phillips files suit, Southern raises the defense in its answer that Phillips’ failure toproperly
maintain the lawnmower led to his injuries. Southern sends interrogatories to Phillips inquiring
about how often he serviced the lawnmower before he sustained his injuries. Do these
interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 3
5 out of 5 points
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern inquiring whether other customers have been injured
while using the same Southern riding lawnmower. Do these interrogatories seek relevant
information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 4
5 out of 5 points
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern requesting emails from company employeesabout the
design of the lawnmower. Southern objects on the ground that such emailswould be
inadmissible “hearsay” at trial. Is the objection proper?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 5
5 out of 5 points
Phillips seeks compensatory damages for the injuries he sustained from the riding lawnmower.
Southern sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents to Phillipsseeking copies of all
medical bills related to the accident. Must Phillips produce them?
, Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 6
5 out of 5 points
Peach Computer Company files a lawsuit against MBI, Inc. alleging that MBI violated Peach’s
patent on a particular software program. Peach sends a Rule 34 Request for Production of
documents requesting every email that has ever been sent or received byan MBI employee. MBI
objects to the request on the ground that it is unduly burdensome. Is the objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 7
5 out of 5 points
Simpson files a lawsuit against Stuff Mart claiming that the company has engaged in a pattern of
sex discrimination by refusing to promote her and other women in the company due to their sex.
Simpson sends interrogatories to Stuff Mart asking how manywomen in the company have been
promoted within the past five years. Do these interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 8
0 out of 5 points
Titus sues Hamilton for injuries sustained in a boating accident. Titus alleges that Hamilton was
drunk at the time of accident. Hamilton hires a lawyer and tells him thathe had consumed ten
beers and was in fact drunk at the time of the accident. Titus sends interrogatories to Hamilton
asking how many drinks he had consumed before theaccident. Titus’s attorney objects to the
interrogatory based on the attorney-client privilege. Is the objection valid?
Selected Ye
Answer: s
• Question 9
0 out of 5 points
During Hamilton’s deposition, Titus asks him, “Did you tell your lawyer you had tenbeers
before the accident?” Titus’s lawyer objects to the question based on the attorney-client
privilege. Does the privilege apply to this question?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 10
0 out of 5 points
