1. After you review the designs, describe which research design you would expect to
find when searching for evidence relevant to your own research question from Week
2. Why? Explain your answer. After review, I believe that the most common research
design would be the Quasi-Experimental Design. According to our text, treatment is
introduced to the group but there aren’t random assignments or a control group. I think
that with CAUTI’s the best way to determine improvement rates is to utilize a policy that
targets all patients with foley catheters and then compares the number of infections to the
previously recorded infection rate. This type of design cannot definitively determine
causality and the research can be weaker than experimental design. But I believe this
would be the greatest benefit to my research question. Since choosing to treat patients
differently could potentially cause harm to my patients.
2. The most common sampling method is the convenience sample; therefore, many of
the studies that you find for evidence use this sampling method. What are the
implications for using a convenience sample on the way you interpret and use the
findings? “Convenience sampling (also known as availability sampling) is a specific
type of non-probability sampling method that relies on data collection from population
members who are conveniently available to participate in study,” (Research Methodology
Website, n.d., para. 1). A convenience sample has several advantages. These include:
a.) Simplicity of sampling
b.) Helpful for hypothesis generation
c.) Short-time frame for data collection
d.) Cheapest to implement