GOVT 407 Exam 3
• Question 1
0 out of 5 points
Phillips was injured using a riding lawnmower manufactured by Southern
Tractor Company.
Phillips sues Southern alleging that it negligently designed the lawnmower.
During discovery, he sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents
that includesa request for all written documents showing the design of the
mower. Southern objects to this request on the ground that it is irrelevant. Is
this objection valid?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 2
When Phillips files suit, Southern raises the defense in its answer that
Phillips’ failure toproperly maintain the lawnmower led to his injuries.
Southern sends interrogatories to Phillips inquiring about how often he
serviced the lawnmower before he sustained his injuries. Do these
interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 3
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern inquiring whether other customers
have been injured while using the same Southern riding lawnmower. Do
these interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 4
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern requesting emails from company
employeesabout the design of the lawnmower. Southern objects on the
ground that such emailswould be inadmissible “hearsay” at trial. Is the
objection proper?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 5
5 out of 5 points
Phillips seeks compensatory damages for the injuries he sustained from the
, riding lawnmower. Southern sends a Rule 34 request for production of
documents to Phillipsseeking copies of all medical bills related to the accident.
Must Phillips produce them?
• Question 1
0 out of 5 points
Phillips was injured using a riding lawnmower manufactured by Southern
Tractor Company.
Phillips sues Southern alleging that it negligently designed the lawnmower.
During discovery, he sends a Rule 34 request for production of documents
that includesa request for all written documents showing the design of the
mower. Southern objects to this request on the ground that it is irrelevant. Is
this objection valid?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 2
When Phillips files suit, Southern raises the defense in its answer that
Phillips’ failure toproperly maintain the lawnmower led to his injuries.
Southern sends interrogatories to Phillips inquiring about how often he
serviced the lawnmower before he sustained his injuries. Do these
interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 3
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern inquiring whether other customers
have been injured while using the same Southern riding lawnmower. Do
these interrogatories seek relevant information?
Selected
Ye
Answer: s
5 out of 5 points
• Question 4
Phillips sends interrogatories to Southern requesting emails from company
employeesabout the design of the lawnmower. Southern objects on the
ground that such emailswould be inadmissible “hearsay” at trial. Is the
objection proper?
Selected N
Answer: o
• Question 5
5 out of 5 points
Phillips seeks compensatory damages for the injuries he sustained from the
, riding lawnmower. Southern sends a Rule 34 request for production of
documents to Phillipsseeking copies of all medical bills related to the accident.
Must Phillips produce them?
