Case IAnalysis I– IWeek I2 1
Case IAnalysis: IGonzales Iv. IRaich
Week I 2
I Felix IGallo IBordas
DeVry IUniversity,
Keller IGraduate ISchool Iof IManagement
I MGMT520 I– ILegal, IPolitical, IEthical IDimensions Iof IBusiness
Professor ILorenzo IBowman
September I15, I2019
I
This Istudy Isource Iwas Idownloaded Iby I100000841397762 Ifrom ICourseHero.com Ion I04-14-2022 I01:02:26 IGMT I-
05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/49697381/MGMT520-Week-2-Case-Analysisdocx/
, Course IProject I– IWeek I1 2
Parties
Plaintiff: IAngel IRaich, Iet Ial. IDefendant: IAttorney IGeneral IGonzales.
Facts
The Irespondents Iwere Iresidents Ifrom Ithe Istate Iof ICalifornia Iwho Iused Imarijuana Ifor
I medical Iconditions, Ipursuant Ito Ithe Iterms Iof Ithe ICompassionate IUse IAct. IAn Iinvestigation Iwas
I held Iand Icounty Iofficials Idetermined Ithat Ithe Irespondent’s Imedical Imarijuana Iuse Iwas Iwithin Ithe
California Ilaw. IDespite Ithis, Ithe Ifederal Iagents Idestroyed Ithe Irespondent’s Imarijuana Iplants. IThe
I
respondents Ithen Ibrought Ian Iaction Isuit Iagainst Ithe IAttorney IGeneral Iof Ithe IUSA Iand Ialso Ithe
I
I head Iof Ithe IDrug IEnforcement IAdministration I(DEA), Ilooking Ifor Ideclaratory Iand Iinjunctive
I relief Ibarring Ithe Iexecution Iof Ithe Ifederal ICSA I(Controlled ISubstances IAct).
Procedure
The Iplaintiff Ibrought Ithe Isuit Iagainst Ithe IAG Iand Ihead Iof Ithe IDEA, Isearching Ifor
I injunctive Iand Ideclaratory Irelief Inegating Ithe Iapplication Iof Ithe Ifederal ICSA Ito Ithe Ipoint Iit
I prevents Igaining, Iholding Ior Imanufacturing Imarijuana Ifor Ipersonal Imedical Iuse. IThe Idistrict
I court Idenied Ithe Irespondent’s Imotion Ifor Ia Ipreliminary Iinjunction. IFollowing, Ia Idivided Ipanel Iof
the Icourt Iof Iappeals Ifor Ithe INinth Icircuit Iordered Ithe Idistrict Icourt Ito Ienter Ia Ipreliminary
I
I injunction. IThe Icourt Iof Iappeals Iheld Ithat Ithe ICSA Iwas Ian Iinvalid Iuse Iof Ithe ICongress’s
I Commerce IClause. IThen Ithe IUnited IStates I(Attorney IGeneral IGonzales) Iappealed Ithis Idecision,
This Istudy Isource Iwas Idownloaded Iby I100000841397762 Ifrom ICourseHero.com Ion I04-14-2022 I01:02:26 IGMT I-
05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/49697381/MGMT520-Week-2-Case-Analysisdocx/
Case IAnalysis: IGonzales Iv. IRaich
Week I 2
I Felix IGallo IBordas
DeVry IUniversity,
Keller IGraduate ISchool Iof IManagement
I MGMT520 I– ILegal, IPolitical, IEthical IDimensions Iof IBusiness
Professor ILorenzo IBowman
September I15, I2019
I
This Istudy Isource Iwas Idownloaded Iby I100000841397762 Ifrom ICourseHero.com Ion I04-14-2022 I01:02:26 IGMT I-
05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/49697381/MGMT520-Week-2-Case-Analysisdocx/
, Course IProject I– IWeek I1 2
Parties
Plaintiff: IAngel IRaich, Iet Ial. IDefendant: IAttorney IGeneral IGonzales.
Facts
The Irespondents Iwere Iresidents Ifrom Ithe Istate Iof ICalifornia Iwho Iused Imarijuana Ifor
I medical Iconditions, Ipursuant Ito Ithe Iterms Iof Ithe ICompassionate IUse IAct. IAn Iinvestigation Iwas
I held Iand Icounty Iofficials Idetermined Ithat Ithe Irespondent’s Imedical Imarijuana Iuse Iwas Iwithin Ithe
California Ilaw. IDespite Ithis, Ithe Ifederal Iagents Idestroyed Ithe Irespondent’s Imarijuana Iplants. IThe
I
respondents Ithen Ibrought Ian Iaction Isuit Iagainst Ithe IAttorney IGeneral Iof Ithe IUSA Iand Ialso Ithe
I
I head Iof Ithe IDrug IEnforcement IAdministration I(DEA), Ilooking Ifor Ideclaratory Iand Iinjunctive
I relief Ibarring Ithe Iexecution Iof Ithe Ifederal ICSA I(Controlled ISubstances IAct).
Procedure
The Iplaintiff Ibrought Ithe Isuit Iagainst Ithe IAG Iand Ihead Iof Ithe IDEA, Isearching Ifor
I injunctive Iand Ideclaratory Irelief Inegating Ithe Iapplication Iof Ithe Ifederal ICSA Ito Ithe Ipoint Iit
I prevents Igaining, Iholding Ior Imanufacturing Imarijuana Ifor Ipersonal Imedical Iuse. IThe Idistrict
I court Idenied Ithe Irespondent’s Imotion Ifor Ia Ipreliminary Iinjunction. IFollowing, Ia Idivided Ipanel Iof
the Icourt Iof Iappeals Ifor Ithe INinth Icircuit Iordered Ithe Idistrict Icourt Ito Ienter Ia Ipreliminary
I
I injunction. IThe Icourt Iof Iappeals Iheld Ithat Ithe ICSA Iwas Ian Iinvalid Iuse Iof Ithe ICongress’s
I Commerce IClause. IThen Ithe IUnited IStates I(Attorney IGeneral IGonzales) Iappealed Ithis Idecision,
This Istudy Isource Iwas Idownloaded Iby I100000841397762 Ifrom ICourseHero.com Ion I04-14-2022 I01:02:26 IGMT I-
05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/49697381/MGMT520-Week-2-Case-Analysisdocx/
