Part 1 of 4 - Chi-Square Test for Homogeneity 8.0/ 8.0 Points
Question 1 of 20
1.0/ 1.0 Points
Click to see additional instructions
Students at a high school are asked to evaluate their experience in the class at the end of each
school year. The courses are evaluated on a 1-4 scale – with 4 being the best experience
possible. In the History Department, the courses typically are evaluated at 10% 1’s, 15% 2’s,
34% 3’s, and 41% 4’s.
Mr. Goodman sets a goal to outscore these numbers. At the end of the year he takes a random
sample of his evaluations and finds 10 1’s, 13 2’s, 48 3’s, and 52 4’s. At the 0.05 level of
significance, can Mr. Goodman claim that his evaluations are significantly different than the
History Department’s?
Enter the test statistic - round to 4 decimal places.
Test statistic= 3.0021
Answer Key: 3.0021
Feedback:
1's 2's 3's 4's
Observed
10 13 48 52
Counts
Expected 123 *.10 = 123*.15 = 123*.34 = 123*.41 =
Counts 12.3 18.45 41.82 50.43
Test Stat =
Question 2 of 20
1.0/ 1.0 Points
Click to see additional instructions
A company manager believes that a person’s ability to be a leader is directly correlated to their
zodiac sign. He never selects someone to chair a committee without first evaluating their zodiac
,sign. An irate employee sets out to prove her manager wrong. She claims that if zodiac sign
truly makes a difference in leadership, then a random sample of 210 CEO’s in our country
would reveal a difference in zodiac sign distribution. She finds the following zodiac signs for
her random sample of 210 CEO’s:
Births Signs
25 Aries
13 Taurus
17 Gemini
21 Cancer
16 Leo
18 Virgo
15 Libra
16 Scorpio
20 Sagittarius
11 Capricorn
23 Aquarius
15 Pisces
Can she conclude that zodiac sign makes a difference in whether or not a person makes a good
leader?
Enter the p-value - round to 4 decimal places. Make sure you put the 0 in front of the decimal.
p-value = 0.4798
Answer Key: 0.4798
Feedback:
The Expected Count is all the same value. 210*(1/12) = 17.5
Expected
Births Signs
Count
25 Aries 17.5
13 Taurus 17.5
17 Gemini 17.5
21 Cancer 17.5
, 16 Leo 17.5
18 Virgo 17.5
15 Libra 17.5
16 Scorpio 17.5
Sagittariu
20 17.5
s
11 Capricorn 17.5
23 Aquarius 17.5
15 Pisces 17.5
Use Excel to find the p-value
=CHISQ.TEST(Highlight Observed, Highlight Expected)
Question 3 of 20
1.0/ 1.0 Points
Click to see additional instructions
An urban economist is curious if the distribution in where Oregon residents live is different
today than it was in 1990. She observes that today there are approximately 3,109 thousand
residents in NW Oregon, 902 thousand residents in SW Oregon, 244 thousand in Central
Oregon, and 102 thousand in Eastern Oregon. She knows that in 1990 the breakdown was as
follows: 72.7% NW Oregon, 20.7% SW Oregon, 4.8% Central Oregon, and 2.8% Eastern
Oregon.
Can she conclude that the distribution in residence is different today at a 0.05 level of
significance?
Enter the test statistic - round to 4 decimal places.
Test statistic= 10.1714
Answer Key: 10.1714
Feedback:
NW Central Eastern
SW Oregon
Oregon Oregon Oregon
Observed
3109 902 244 102
Counts
Expected 4357*.727 4357*.207= 4357*.048=4357*.028=
Counts = 3167.539 901.899 209.136 121.996