Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case uitwerking

NUR502 TOPIC 7 DISCUSSION QUESTION 1

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
2
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
28-04-2022
Geschreven in
2022/2023

NUR502 TOPIC 7 DISCUSSION QUESTION 1 The influence of consequential ethics as an ethical framework (the greatest good for the greatest number) opposes the ethical principle of deontology (i.e., the rightness of an act itself determines what is right). Both of these impact the nursing profession. Modern social exchange theories are based on the principle of utility. Read the assumptions of social exchange theory and consider how these would affect the nurse-patient relationship, compared to how these impact the nurse within the health care environment. To what extent are all theories ethical? Is social exchange theory compatible with the values of the nursing profession?

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NUR502 TOPIC 7 DISCUSSION QUESTION 1

The influence of consequential ethics as an ethical framework (the greatest good for the greatest
number) opposes the ethical principle of deontology (i.e., the rightness of an act itself determines what
is right). Both of these impact the nursing profession. Modern social exchange theories are based on the
principle of utility. Read the assumptions of social exchange theory and consider how these would affect
the nurse-patient relationship, compared to how these impact the nurse within the health care
environment. To what extent are all theories ethical? Is social exchange theory compatible with the
values of the nursing profession?



The basis of the social exchange theory is that if a person receives a positive response from an exchange
with another person, then they are more likely to repeat the behavior. If a negative response is received,
then the person will most likely not repeat the behavior (McEwen & Wills, 2014). A person thinks about
the benefits and risks of a relationship and then tries to decide whether the relationship should continue
or be terminated (ThoughtCo, 2018). According to the assumptions of the social exchange theory,
humans look to receive some sort of positive outcome from social interactions with others and compete
with one another. Another assumption is that humans do not always have full knowledge of a situation,
however, they have some kind of an idea which helps them to weigh the pros and the cons of a
situation.

Based on the social exchange theory, a nurse has several interactions with a patient in which responses
are exchanged. This can include providing education, resources, medications, and services. In return, the
nurse expects positive feedback from the patient such as acknowledgement of the learning process by
practicing self-efficacy. If the nurse receives a negative response, such as a patient or family member
that is unappreciative, then the nurse may be less likely to devote more time to that particular
patient.The patient provides several things to the nurse as well, their time, personal space, and person
information. In return, the patient expects to receive individualized care and to feel listened too and
respected. If a patient receives a negative response from the nurse, this could lead to mistrust and
eventually the patient may not seek out medical assistance when needed.

Overall, I feel that the social exchange theory is ethical. However, if the nurse expects something from
the patient such as monetary or gift rewards, then the nurse would be using the relationship unethically.
Likewise, if the patient is expecting something in return from the nurse such as a prescription or supplies
the nurse is unable to provide, then this would be unethical as well. If used appropriately, the social
exchange theory is compatible with nursing. The theory provides insight into nurse-patient relationships
and can provide the nurse with an understanding into why a patient may not be practicing self-efficacy.




References:

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 april 2022
Aantal pagina's
2
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Case uitwerking
Docent(en)
Professor
Cijfer
A+

Onderwerpen

$7.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
verifiedtutors Walden University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2689
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
1821
Documenten
2315
Laatst verkocht
3 maanden geleden

4.6

833 beoordelingen

5
680
4
53
3
48
2
15
1
37

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen