Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

IB History Paper 2 summary - Authoritarian States

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
24
Geüpload op
19-05-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

This document is a condensed pack of notes for IB History students studying the topic "Authoritarian States" for Paper 2, containing detailed yet concise analysis on factors leading to the emergence to power of authoritarian leaders, as well as the extent of success and failure of their policies. The "emergence to power" for Hitler and Castro was examined, while the "maintenance of power" (consolidation of power and policies implemented) of Hitler and Mao was examined. Students can easily pick and choose examples from the tables to fit into their essays.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Emergence to power
Conditions in which authoritarian leader came to power Methods used by authoritarian leader


Factor Hitler (1919-34) Castro (1945-59)

Economic ● 1919 Treaty of Versailles (ToV) + 1920 Paris Peace Conference + 1921 ● Late 1950s: US financial interests (investments in Cuban companies,
factors London Schedule of Payments - Crushing reparations + territorial subsidiaries with local Cuban investment)
(provided the losses ○ 90% of mines; 80% of public utilities; 50% of railways; 40% of sugar
ideal ○ 132 bil gold marks → Reduced to 121 bil (Young Plan) production; 25% of bank deposits
conditions for ○ Lost 48% of iron resources (Rhineland independence) → Dependence on US (Cuban stability relied on US interference),
the ● 1923 Hyperinflation crisis great extent of US control over economy, US motivated to interfere in
emergence of ○ Caused by Reichsbank printing money to support general Cuban politics to protect interests
authoritarian strike against France’s invasion of the Ruhr ● Overreliance on sugar industry
states) ○ Middle-class suffered from huge loss of savings ○ Accounted for 80-90% of national agricultural production
● 1929 Great Depression (GD) ○ Vulnerable to price fluctuations
Hitler: Mainly ○ Dawes Plan (1924) + Young Plan (1929) made Germany ○ Seasonal employment - often poor
a result of dependent on US loans ● 1929 Great Depression → Economic recession + poverty
post-WW1 ○ Unemployment - 1929: 1.5 mil → 1932: 6 mil (30% of ○ National income fell (1925: 708 mil pesos → 1933: 294 mil)
strife workforce) ; Industrial production halved ○ ¼ of workers became unemployed
(reparations, ○ Incited middle class fears of hyperinflation ○ Sugar crop worth dropped (1929: $200 mil → 1932: $40 mil)
struggle for ○ Nazi votes - 1928: Nazis 2.6% of the vote → 1932: 37%
● 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreement
territory) + GD ○ Nazi seats in Reichstag - 1928: 12 → 1930: 107
○ Gave US imports preferential tariffs → US could flood Cuban market
→ Low QoL, caused public to turn toward radical political parties
with goods
Castro: USA ■ 1949-58: 75% of all imports came from US, 65% exports
domination of went to the US
finance → ● Inflation → Threatened living standards
stifled ○ Rising to 40% a year for foodstuffs while pay levels stagnated
economic ○ Real estate prices soared (1941: $12 a metre → 1957: $200)
growth, led to ○ 1952-54: Income per head fell by 18%
discontent + ○ 1956: Unemployment at 17%
anti-Americani → Stifled Cuba’s economic growth, low QoL, desire for independence from the US,
sm contributed to anti-US sentiment + increasing nationalism

,Social ● Revanchism + Revisionism of ToV ● Urban-rural classicist divide, income inequality: East vs West
divisions/ ○ Distrust of the socialist govt - “November criminals” who ○ West (e.g. Oriente province): Ex-slaves lived in poverty, had poor
signed the “diktat” and took on the full blame of the war in War public welfare
factors
Guilt Clause (Article 231) ■ Avg rural income: $91; Only 2% could afford eggs
● Socialist vs Nationalist ■ 1:2423 doctors in Oriente vs 1:227 doctors in Havana
Hitler:
○ Socialist - workers: Supportive of trade unions ■ Catholic Church associated w/ elite, no welfare provided to
Political
○ Nationalists - war veterans, industrial elites: Anti-trade union, the poor
ideological
middle-class, property owning ○ East (e.g. Havana & cities): Colonists (Spanish) was prosperous,
differences
● Lower-middle class severely affected by 1923 hyperinflation benefitted from US tourism
● Communist vs Nationalist ■ National income: $374
Castro:
○ Fear of the Left after Communist revolution in Russia (1923) ■ Only 20% of population lived in Havana, but it had >80% of
Classism
● Communists (atheists) vs Catholic Church (ideological differences) investment in construction + 62% of salaries & wages
→ Income inequality, causing resentment resulting from unequal
benefits from US intervention
● Racial: Spaniards vs Afro-Carribeans
○ Spaniards dominated ruling class, 60% of Spaniard population had
white origins
○ Afro-Carribeans formed an underclass, were politically insignificant
● Traditional elites vs peasant population
○ Landowners benefited from wealth generated by sugar industry,
lived in the wealthy East
○ Military leadership was corrupt (operational command not always
appointed for military skills)
○ Catholic Church provided little welfare to the poor
○ High pressure on peasants
Long hours, low pay, little education
■ Castro (“History will absolve me”): “85% of small Cuban
agriculturalists are paying rent and living under the constant
threat of expropriation from their plots of land.”
● Rising crime + gangsterism
○ The American mafia dominated tourism
○ Proliferation of casinos and prostitutes (end of the 1950s: Havana
had 270 brothels)
→ Caused high social distress (Suicide rates in 1951: 849 per year
→ 1955: >1000 per year)

Weakness ● Weak constitution → Public lost faith in democracy ● Government instability prior to Batista
of political ○ Article 48: Decisions could be made quickly in “emergency” ○ By 1952, changed govts 4 times after uprising against Machado
situations (1933)
system
■ Non-democratic, President and Chancellor can make ■ Machado dictatorship → Provisional govt led by Grau →

, (lack of faith in decisions without consulting Parliament Batista’s presidency (1940-44) → Autentico presidency
current govt) ■ Hindenburg forced to use Article 48 to override the (1944-48) → Batista’s coup (1952)
Reichstag during GD: Reichstag didn’t agree with ● Domination of the US
Similar - Brüning’s plan to cut govt expenditure → showed ○ After Treaty of Paris (1898), politics dominated by US interests
inability of inability to commit to democracy, undermined power ■ Election law denied social justice, enabled only literate, rich
dominant of the Reichstag males to vote, blacks were excluded
regime to ○ Proportional representation → Led to coalition government ■ Elections rigged in favour of pro-US political candidates
respond to forming ○ Lack of true independence angered Cuban public, anti-US sentiment,
issues + their ■ 6 coalition governments between 1925-9 desire for independence, increasing nationalism + revolutionary
inherent ■ Difficult to get consensus b/c no party was ever able sentiment
unpopularity achieve a ⅔ majority → Inefficient decision making ● Failure to gain/retain support
(e.g. inability to solve economic crises of GD) ○ During 1940 presidency: supported by socialists due to his labour
Different - ● Ineffective solutions to economic issues laws + support for labour unions
Weimar failed ○ Poor decisions, Chancellor Brüning decided to cut govt ■ Failed to address social inequity + corruption → unable to
mainly due to expenditure of wages + unemployment welfare to cope w/ retain former popular support
economic failing tax revenue ○ Pro-American, pro-capitalist, puppet govt of US
crisis (enjoyed ○ Socialist govt → Seen as a betrayal by the working class ■ Adhered to pro-US economic policy → drove away plantation
period of ● Association w/ ToV owners, industrialists, bankers (business interests negatively
prosperity ○ “Stab in the back” myth, impacted by US economic policies, saw potential for future
before) ; November criminals → Distrust of social democrats (leading losses) to support Castro (who promised to end US
Batista’s party SPD) corporatism)
political ● Political intrigue within Weimar Government → Inability to unite against ○ Failed to counter Castro’s propaganda → Portrayed as brutal+corrupt
alignment + Nazism ● Batista’s oppressive despotism
engagements ○ General von Schleicher disagreed w/ von Papen’s reactionary ○ Heavy censorship of the media
in corruption policies, persuaded several government ministers to turn ○ Seized power in a coup → suspended constitutional guarantees,
created his against Papen → Resigned from office eliminated opposing political parties, suspended right to vote
own ○ Supported by industrialists, Papen plots to put Hitler as ○ Severe repression, use of violence against late 1950s student
unpopularity Chancellor and himself as Vice-Chancellor to oust von protests
Schleicher, who was Chancellor ■ Students named as “martyrs”
● Political instability → Demonstrated opposition toward Weimar Republic ● Batista’s corrupt dictatorship
○ Spartacus uprising (Communist) (1919) → Working class ○ Low paid officials expected to top up income through bribery+graft
hatred of SPD ○ Associations with crime organisations (e.g. American Mafia)
○ Kapp Putsch (Nationalist) (1920) ■ Sanctioned + gave mafia control of Havana's racetracks and
○ Munich Putsch (Nationalist) (1923) casinos
→ Failures of Weimar Government caused the public to have little confidence ■ Personally profitted from drug, gambling, and prostitution
for the existing democratic political regime, resulting in the turn towards businesses (30% cut from casinos, hotels, nightclubs run by
extremist parties (rise of political extremism) mafia, contributed millions of dollars to Swiss bank accounts)
→ Fostered social climate of gangsterism + depravity (by the
end of 1950s: Havana had 270 brothels)
○ Faith in Cuban govt undermined by succession of corrupt leaders

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 mei 2022
Aantal pagina's
24
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$20.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
jessiecho

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
jessiecho University College London
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
2
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen