Pfizer , a large research-based pharmaceutical company, enters into a contract with a start-up
biotechnology company called HealthPro and promises:
1. To grant HealthPro the exclusive rights to use Pfizer’s Technology A for the life of its patent. The
license gives
HealthPro the exclusive right to market, distribute, and manufacture Drug B as developed using
Technology A.
2. To assign four full-time equivalent employees to perform research and development services for
HealthPro in a specially designated Pfizer lab facility. The primary objective of these services is to
receive regulatory approval to market and distribute Drug B using Technology A.
HealthPro is required to use Pfizer’s lab to perform the research and development services necessary to
develop Drug B using Technology A, because the know how and expertise related to Technology A are
proprietary to Pfizer and not available elsewhere.
Required:
Determine which parts of this contract are separate performance obligations. Explain your reasoning for
each obligation.
Answer:
The license granted by Pfizer is not a separate performance obligation. The only way to exploit the
license is via utilizing ongoing R&D services from Pfizer. The license does not provide utility on its own
or together with other goods or services that HealthPro has received previously from Pfizer or that are
available from other entities. Rather, the license requires Pfizer’s R&D services and proprietary expertise
to be valuable. Therefore, Pfizer would combine the license with the R&D services to HealthPro and
account for them as a single performance obligation.