DE LA SALLE LIPA
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Nursing Care Management 101
Procedural Checklist in
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR
ASSESSMENT
Name: ______________________ Date: Year/Sec:
Rating:
General Objectives:
The student will be able to discuss and demonstrate proper assessment of the
peripheral vascular with confidence and accuracy.
Specific Objectives:
1. Explain the concept and purpose of the assessment.
2. Can perform the assessment systematically.
3. Correctly demonstrate proper assessment while rationalizing each step in the
procedure.
CRITERIA:
Item Descriptors Verbal Interpretation
Weight
1.0 Excellent Performed the procedure with great ease and
confidence, observing work ethics (prudent,
accepts criticisms and suggestions), able to
rationalize scientifically and shows
diligence in documenting observations at all times .
0.75 Very Performed the procedure with less confidence,
Satisfactory observing work ethics (prudent, accepts criticisms
and suggestions),
able to rationalize scientifically and shows minimal
diligence in documenting observations.
0.50 Satisfactory Performed the procedure but requires close
supervision and
shows potential for improvement.
0.25 Needs Failed to perform the procedure, unable to function
Improvement well and needs repeated specific/ detailed guidance or
direction.
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Nursing Care Management 101
Procedural Checklist in
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR
ASSESSMENT
Name: ______________________ Date: Year/Sec:
Rating:
General Objectives:
The student will be able to discuss and demonstrate proper assessment of the
peripheral vascular with confidence and accuracy.
Specific Objectives:
1. Explain the concept and purpose of the assessment.
2. Can perform the assessment systematically.
3. Correctly demonstrate proper assessment while rationalizing each step in the
procedure.
CRITERIA:
Item Descriptors Verbal Interpretation
Weight
1.0 Excellent Performed the procedure with great ease and
confidence, observing work ethics (prudent,
accepts criticisms and suggestions), able to
rationalize scientifically and shows
diligence in documenting observations at all times .
0.75 Very Performed the procedure with less confidence,
Satisfactory observing work ethics (prudent, accepts criticisms
and suggestions),
able to rationalize scientifically and shows minimal
diligence in documenting observations.
0.50 Satisfactory Performed the procedure but requires close
supervision and
shows potential for improvement.
0.25 Needs Failed to perform the procedure, unable to function
Improvement well and needs repeated specific/ detailed guidance or
direction.
