HLSC 2P27
Fall 2022
Major Assignment 1 (Part 2) – Peer Assessment Form
Due: Thursday October 20, 2022 (11:59 pm)
Based on past experience, we have made 3 of 15 marks on the major assignment to be awarded according to a peer
assessment. The main purpose of this is to reward those in your groups who contributed fully to the assignment and also
to provide opportunity to identify students who have not contributed fully. You are also required to honestly rate your
own contributions to this assignment using the same scoring system. Both students in your group should hand in the
“peer assessment” on Sakai.
Please assign a grade of 0 to 3 for each person, based upon our rubric.
Your individual contributions (3 marks):
Grades to be assigned as follows:
3 marks – evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to all parts of the
submission, and can take responsibility for the entire submission
2 marks – evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to SOME (but not all)
parts of the submission, and can take responsibility for the entire submission
1 mark - evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to SOME (but not all)
parts of the submission, and can take responsibility for those parts only
0 marks – the group member did not contribute to the project in a substantial manner
Name of students in the group Score out of 3 Rationale
(including yourself)
Salomi Pathan 3 Carried out the given tasks within the timeframe. Worked on citing
the resources. Performed proofreading and corrected the errors.
Regularly present in all group meetings and wrote down minutes for
each one of them.
Mittal Tandel 3 Consistently performed the research on the topics discussed.
Provided with all the information ahead of schedule. Attended all the
group meetings. Leaded the work to be completed by each group
meeting. An excellent team member to work with.
Fall 2022
Major Assignment 1 (Part 2) – Peer Assessment Form
Due: Thursday October 20, 2022 (11:59 pm)
Based on past experience, we have made 3 of 15 marks on the major assignment to be awarded according to a peer
assessment. The main purpose of this is to reward those in your groups who contributed fully to the assignment and also
to provide opportunity to identify students who have not contributed fully. You are also required to honestly rate your
own contributions to this assignment using the same scoring system. Both students in your group should hand in the
“peer assessment” on Sakai.
Please assign a grade of 0 to 3 for each person, based upon our rubric.
Your individual contributions (3 marks):
Grades to be assigned as follows:
3 marks – evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to all parts of the
submission, and can take responsibility for the entire submission
2 marks – evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to SOME (but not all)
parts of the submission, and can take responsibility for the entire submission
1 mark - evidence provided that the group member provided a substantial contribution to SOME (but not all)
parts of the submission, and can take responsibility for those parts only
0 marks – the group member did not contribute to the project in a substantial manner
Name of students in the group Score out of 3 Rationale
(including yourself)
Salomi Pathan 3 Carried out the given tasks within the timeframe. Worked on citing
the resources. Performed proofreading and corrected the errors.
Regularly present in all group meetings and wrote down minutes for
each one of them.
Mittal Tandel 3 Consistently performed the research on the topics discussed.
Provided with all the information ahead of schedule. Attended all the
group meetings. Leaded the work to be completed by each group
meeting. An excellent team member to work with.
