Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Review Test Submission: Quiz 1 (ALL ANSWERS ARE CORRECT) University of British Columbia PHIL 120

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
12
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
23-01-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Review Test Submission: Quiz 1 User Shu Kai Yan Course 2015WC­PHIL120­99C­Introduction to Critical Thinking­99C Jan 2016 Test Quiz 1 Started 1/9/16 8:37 PM Submitted 1/9/16 9:36 PM Due Date 1/11/16 11:59 PM Status Completed Attempt Score 26 out of 30 points Time Elapsed 58 minutes out of 1 hour Instructions General Instructions: Quiz 1 consists of 15 questions. You are given 1 (one) hour to complete it. Questions 1-5: For each of the given passages, identify the premises and the conclusion(s) of the argument contained in them, place the argument in standard form, and then match it with one of the standard forms provided. When placing arguments in standard form, remember that the argument may have some internal logical structure (i.e., it may be compound), i.e., it may consist of several subarguments, when a conclusion of some subargument is fed into another subargument as a premise. In such a case make sure you show all the internal logical structure (i.e., all subarguments). In each case also make sure you eliminate all unnecessary or redundant words/phrases that do not do any logical work, and so are not part of the argument. Questions 6-15: For these questions you first need to determine whether each of the following passages contains an Ad Baculum argument and/or Ad Hominem argument. If yes, you need to further determine whether it involves a corresponding fallacy. Answer Y (Yes) or N (No) in the corresponding blanks. NOTE: Remember that each of Ad Baculum and Ad Hominem arguments can be either non-fallacious or fallacious; it is the latter case when we call a corresponding argument, e.g., an Ad Baculum argument, an Ad Baculum fallacy. IMPORTANT: Please note that the quiz must be finished and submitted before the corresponding deadline as in the schedule, not just started - once the deadline is reached, the system will automatically stop the quiz and you will no longer be allowed to continue with the My Connect Courses Library Resources Content Collection Shu Kai Yan 27 4/28/2016 Review Test Submission: Quiz 1 – 2015WC-PHIL120-...

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

4/28/2016 Review Test Submission: Quiz 1 – 2015WC-PHIL120-...

Shu Kai Yan 27
My Connect Courses Library Resources Content Collection




H Learning Modules Module 1: The Quarrel Review Test Submission: Quiz 1




Review Test Submission: Quiz 1


User Shu Kai Yan
Course 2015WC­PHIL120­99C­Introduction to Critical Thinking­99C Jan 2016
Test Quiz 1
Started 1/9/16 8:37 PM
Submitted 1/9/16 9:36 PM
Due Date 1/11/16 11:59 PM
Status Completed
Attempt 26 out of 30 points
Score
Time 58 minutes out of 1 hour
Elapsed
Instructions General Instructions:

Quiz 1 consists of 15 questions. You are given 1 (one) hour to complete it.

Questions 1-5:

For each of the given passages, identify the premises and the conclusion(s) of the
argument contained in them, place the argument in standard form, and then match it
with one of the standard forms provided. When placing arguments in standard form,
remember that the argument may have some internal logical structure (i.e., it may be
compound), i.e., it may consist of several subarguments, when a conclusion of some
subargument is fed into another subargument as a premise. In such a case make sure
you show all the internal logical structure (i.e., all subarguments). In each case also
make sure you eliminate all unnecessary or redundant words/phrases that do not do
any logical work, and so are not part of the argument.

Questions 6-15:

For these questions you first need to determine whether each of the following
passages contains an Ad Baculum argument and/or Ad Hominem argument. If yes,
you need to further determine whether it involves a corresponding fallacy. Answer Y
(Yes) or N (No) in the corresponding blanks.

NOTE: Remember that each of Ad Baculum and Ad Hominem arguments can be either
non-fallacious or fallacious; it is the latter case when we call a corresponding
argument, e.g., an Ad Baculum argument, an Ad Baculum fallacy.

IMPORTANT:
Please note that the quiz must be finished and submitted before the corresponding
deadline as in the schedule, not just started - once the deadline is reached, the system
will automatically stop the quiz and you will no longer be allowed to continue with the
https://connect.ubc.ca/webapps/assessment/review/review.jsp?attempt_id=_42366347_1&course_id=_68247_1&content_id=_3151449_1&outcome_id=_37295374_… 1/12

, 4/28/2016 Review Test Submission: Quiz 1 – 2015WC-PHIL120-...

quiz (so you might lose your points for the quiz). Also, when you are done, make sure
you press the Submit button ­ unless you do so, the quiz may not automatically be
submitted to the system (and you risk losing all the points for this quiz)!

If, while taking the Quiz, you experience any technical problems which prevent you
from completing the Quiz, you must immediately report your issue to the IT­people
responsible for the technical issues (not the instructor!) by following the "DL Help
Desk" link on the main course menu. The Help Desk people monitor and record the
current situation and they will then send their report to me, the instructor, with all the
relevant information. If not reported to the DL Help Desk, I, the instructor, will not be
able to verify any issues with the Quiz, and, as such, will not be able to change your
grade or give you any other attempt to finish the quiz.

Results All Answers, Submitted Answers, Correct Answers, Feedback, Incorrectly Answered Questions
Displayed


Question 1 0 out of 2 points

Given the passage below, place the argument contained in it in standard form,
and then match it with one of the standard forms provided below.

Similar effects typically have similar causes. An intelligent designer is usually found to be the
cause of an orderly mechanism such as a watch. Therefore, since the Universe is similar in
form and its intricate operation to an intelligently designed mechanism, the cause of the
Universe is probably also an intelligent designer, albeit one great enough to design the whole
Universe.

Selected a.
Answer: Standard Form:
Premise: An intelligent designer is usually found to be the cause of an orderly
mechanism such as a watch.
Premise: Similar effects typically have similar causes.
(Intermediate) Conclusion: The cause of the Universe is probably also an
intelligent designer albeit one great enough to design the whole Universe).
Premise: The cause of the Universe is probably also an intelligent designer
(albeit one great enough to design the whole Universe).
(Major) Conclusion: The Universe is similar in form and its intricate operation
to an intelligently designed mechanism.

Answers: a.
Standard Form:
Premise: An intelligent designer is usually found to be the cause of an orderly
mechanism such as a watch.
Premise: Similar effects typically have similar causes.
(Intermediate) Conclusion: The cause of the Universe is probably also an
intelligent designer albeit one great enough to design the whole Universe).
Premise: The cause of the Universe is probably also an intelligent designer
(albeit one great enough to design the whole Universe).
(Major) Conclusion: The Universe is similar in form and its intricate operation
to an intelligently designed mechanism.

b.




https://connect.ubc.ca/webapps/assessment/review/review.jsp?attempt_id=_42366347_1&course_id=_68247_1&content_id=_3151449_1&outcome_id=_37295374_… 2/12

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
23 januari 2023
Aantal pagina's
12
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$9.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
ExamsConnoisseur Self
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
587
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
344
Documenten
1492
Laatst verkocht
4 weken geleden

4.2

68 beoordelingen

5
40
4
11
3
13
2
1
1
3

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen