Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

AAA Human Rights Economics Core SPRING 2022

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
412
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-02-2023
Written in
2022/2023

AAA Human Rights Economics Core SPRING 2022 Affirmative – Need to Shun Human Rights Abusers 8 Need to Shun Human Rights Abusers 9 Must Always Fight Evil 12 Must Reject Support for Human Rights Violators 15 Must Cut Ties to Evil Institutions 18 Shunning Avoids Complicity 19 Engagement Morally Wrong 20 AT: Other Interests Outweighs 22 AT: Rights Violations Justified 23 AT: Rights Violations are Only Minor 25 AT: One Individual Rejection Doesn’t Solve 26 AT: Shunning Fails / Backfires 29 AT: Shunning Reinforces Abuses 31 AT: Can’t Impose Values on Other Countries 33 AT: Shunning = Complete Isolation 35 AT: Shunning is Hypocritical 36 AT: “Weigh Consequences” 38 A2 Utilitarianism 43 A2 Extinction outweighs 46 AT: “States Not Moral Actors” 48 AT: “Shunning Hurts Human Rights” 50 AT: “U.S. Hypocritical” 51 AT: “No Brightline” 52 Affirmative – Human Rights Good 54 Human Rights Good 55 Prevent Human Extinction 56 War 59 Equality 62 Deontological Obligation 63

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

1

Debate US – Human Rights vs. Economics (UILD Spring
2022 LD).



AAA Human Rights Economics Core SPRING 2022

Affirmative – Need to Shun Human Rights Abusers.......................................................................................................... 8
Need to Shun Human Rights Abusers ........................................................................................................................ 9
Must Always Fight Evil.............................................................................................................................................. 12
Must Reject Support for Human Rights Violators .................................................................................................... 15
Must Cut Ties to Evil Institutions ............................................................................................................................. 18
Shunning Avoids Complicity ..................................................................................................................................... 19
Engagement Morally Wrong .................................................................................................................................... 20
AT: Other Interests Outweighs ................................................................................................................................. 22
AT: Rights Violations Justified .................................................................................................................................. 23
AT: Rights Violations are Only Minor ....................................................................................................................... 25
AT: One Individual Rejection Doesn’t Solve ............................................................................................................. 26
AT: Shunning Fails / Backfires .................................................................................................................................. 29
AT: Shunning Reinforces Abuses .............................................................................................................................. 31
AT: Can’t Impose Values on Other Countries........................................................................................................... 33
AT: Shunning = Complete Isolation .......................................................................................................................... 35
AT: Shunning is Hypocritical ..................................................................................................................................... 36
AT: “Weigh Consequences” ..................................................................................................................................... 38
A2 Utilitarianism....................................................................................................................................................... 43
A2 Extinction outweighs .......................................................................................................................................... 46
AT: “States Not Moral Actors” ................................................................................................................................. 48
AT: “Shunning Hurts Human Rights” ........................................................................................................................ 50
AT: “U.S. Hypocritical”.............................................................................................................................................. 51
AT: “No Brightline” ................................................................................................................................................... 52
Affirmative – Human Rights Good................................................................................................................................... 54
Human Rights Good ..................................................................................................................................................... 55
Prevent Human Extinction ....................................................................................................................................... 56
War ........................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Equality..................................................................................................................................................................... 62
Deontological Obligation.......................................................................................................................................... 63
1

,2

Debate US – Human Rights vs. Economics (UILD Spring
2022Security.....................................................................................................................................................................
LD). 64
Climate Change ........................................................................................................................................................ 65
Terrorism .................................................................................................................................................................. 66
Human Rights Solve Genocide ................................................................................................................................. 69




2

,3

Debate US – Human Rights vs. Economics (UILD Spring 2022 LD).
Human Rights Key to Democracy ............................................................................................................................. 70
Human Rights Key to Hegemony.............................................................................................................................. 71
Discourse Impacts .................................................................................................................................................... 72
U.S. Key to Global Human Rights ............................................................................................................................. 74
Answers to: Common Arguments................................................................................................................................ 78
A2: General Kritiks of Human Rights ........................................................................................................................ 79
A2: HR are imperialist .............................................................................................................................................. 81
A2: HR calculations are zero point ........................................................................................................................... 86
A2: HR are Too Western ........................................................................................................................................... 87
A2: HR are Anthropocentric ..................................................................................................................................... 89
A2: HR Socialize/Make Everyone the Same ............................................................................................................. 90
A2: Cultural Relevatism ............................................................................................................................................ 91
A2: Mutua K of Human Rights .................................................................................................................................. 92
A2: Sovereignty Good DA ....................................................................................................................................... 100
Affirmative – Human Rights Leadership ........................................................................................................................ 104
Affirmative – Democracy Contention............................................................................................................................ 109
Affirmative – Sanctions Good........................................................................................................................................ 117
Sanctions Ethical ........................................................................................................................................................ 118
Sanctions Ethical and Cause Compliance ............................................................................................................... 119
Ethically Justified- Self-Defense and Humanitarian Reasons ................................................................................. 120
Moral Responsibility is with the Target ................................................................................................................. 122
AT: Humanitarian Impact ....................................................................................................................................... 124
Smart Sanctions Avoid Ethical Harms .................................................................................................................... 125
Affirmative -- Deontology Framework .......................................................................................................................... 127
Consequentialism Kills VTL..................................................................................................................................... 128
Utilitarianism Justifies Atrocities............................................................................................................................ 129
Side Constraints ..................................................................................................................................................... 132
Intervening Action .................................................................................................................................................. 134
Critical Consequentialism....................................................................................................................................... 135
AT: Extinction Outweighs ....................................................................................................................................... 136
Extinction Images = Overestimate Risk .................................................................................................................. 137
Tyranny of Survival ................................................................................................................................................. 138
Affirmative – Globalization Good/Interdependence Good Answers ............................................................................ 140
Interdependence Doesn’t Stop War ...................................................................................................................... 141

3

, 3

Debate US – Human Rights vs. Economics (UILD Spring 2022 LD).
Trade Won’t. Stop War .......................................................................................................................................... 145
Negative ........................................................................................................................................................................ 149
Negative – Core Objections ........................................................................................................................................... 150
Must Balance ............................................................................................................................................................. 151
National Interest Objection ....................................................................................................................................... 152
Human Rights Good Answers -- General ................................................................................................................... 153
The conventional wisdom ............................................................................................................................................. 153
Negative –Advantage/Contention Answers .................................................................................................................. 159
Shunning Answers ..................................................................................................................................................... 160
General Human Rights Good Impact Answers........................................................................................................... 164
Human Rights Should be Viewed Consequentially ................................................................................................ 165
Other Concerns Outweigh...................................................................................................................................... 170
A2: All Philosophers Agree Humans Have Fundamental Rights............................................................................. 171
A2: Humans Born with Certain Traits that Prove they Have Human Rights .......................................................... 172
A2: Human Rights Key to Stop Genocide and Death.............................................................................................. 174
A2: Human Rights Key to Stop Genocide and Death.............................................................................................. 176
A2: Declaration of Human Rights Proves Rights Are Universal .............................................................................. 178
A2: Human Rights Prevent Atrocities ..................................................................................................................... 179
Human Rights Credibility Answers............................................................................................................................. 180
General Human Rights Credibility Turns ................................................................................................................ 182
War Turns Human Rights ....................................................................................................................................... 184
Nuke War Outweighs Human Rights ......................................................................................................................... 185
Human Rights Promotion Fails .................................................................................................................................. 187
Human Rights Promotion Undermines Human Rights........................................................................................... 188
Human Rights Pressure Backfires........................................................................................................................... 194
Human Rights Promotion Fails ............................................................................................................................... 198
Negative – Sanctions Bad .............................................................................................................................................. 201
Sanctions Unethical ................................................................................................................................................... 202
Target Innocent Civilians/Use People as Means .................................................................................................... 203
Sanctions = Genocide ............................................................................................................................................. 210
Sanctions Only Ethical if they Cause Change ......................................................................................................... 211
Travel Sanctions Unethical ..................................................................................................................................... 212
Sanctions = Ethnocentric........................................................................................................................................ 214
Outweighs War....................................................................................................................................................... 215

3

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 2, 2023
Number of pages
412
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$16.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
magdamwikash23 Western Governers University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
113
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
94
Documents
5328
Last sold
1 month ago
Magda

NURSING STUDY GUIDES/EXAMS AND NOTES ALL VERIFIED BY EXPERTS All my uploaded documents, exams and essays are verified by relevant experts.I can assure an A or at least 90% if you use any of my documents.

3.9

14 reviews

5
7
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions