Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

WGU C963 Court Cases

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
16-02-2023
Written in
2022/2023

WGU C963 Court Cases Marbury v. Madison Ans- This case involved the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supreme Court declared that the law conflicted with the U.S. Constitution, and the case established the principle of judicial review wherein the Supreme Court has the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by the president to be unconstitutional. Dred Scott v. Sanford Ans- Supreme Court case that decided US Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in federal territories and slaves, as private property, could not be taken away without due process - basically slaves would remain slaves in non-slave states and slaves could not sue because they were not citizens Plessy v. Ferguson Ans- a 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal United States v. Miller Ans- 1939; ruled that the National Firearms Act of 1934 was constitutional, allowing federal govt to ban interstate shipping of some unregistered guns (because it was unrelated to state militias) Korematsu v. US Ans- 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20,000 2 each survivor Brown v Board ofEducation of Topeka (1954) Ans- Supreme Court ruling that overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case of 1896. "Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of public education Mapp v. Ohio Ans- Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court) Gideon v. Wainwright Ans- A person who cannot afford an attorney may have one appointed by the government Sherbert vs. Verner Ans- Unemployment may not be denied on religious basis Grsiwold v. Connecticut Ans- Although several state constitutions do list the right to privacy as a protected right, the explicit recognition by the Supreme Court of a right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution emerged only in the middle of the twentieth century. In this 1965 case, the court spelled out the right to privacy for the first time in a case that struck down a state law forbidding even married individuals to use any form of contraception. Miranda v. Arizona Ans- Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Ans- Struck down poll taxes at the state level Tinker v. Des Moines Ans- Students have the right to symbolic speech at school as long as it is not disruptive Brandenburg v. Ohio Ans- 1969--Determined that a law that proscribes advocacy of violence for political reform is constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such action is not constitutional. Miller v. California Ans- A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value. Cohen v. California Ans- This case involved an arrest and conviction for disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket expressing opposition to the draft (and the Vietnam War). The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court since his actions were silent and he made no attempt to otherwise disturb the peace. Roe v. Wade Ans- (1973) legalized abortion on the basis of a woman's right to privacy Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Ans- A 2010 landmark Supreme Court case that ruled that individuals, corporations, and unions could donate unlimited amounts of money to groups that make independent political expenditures. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Ans- (2014) Allowed closely-held, for-profit corporations to be exempt from a law its owners religiously object to if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest. Furman v. Georgia Ans- This 1972 Supreme Court case struck down all state laws allowing the death penalty stating that they allowed for too much discretion on the part of the judge and jury resulting in lack of consistent administration of the penalty

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

WGU C963 Court Cases
Marbury v. Madison Ans- This case involved the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supreme Court declared that
the law conflicted with the U.S. Constitution, and the case established the principle of judicial review
wherein the Supreme Court has the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by the
president to be unconstitutional.



Dred Scott v. Sanford Ans- Supreme Court case that decided US Congress did not have the power to
prohibit slavery in federal territories and slaves, as private property, could not be taken away without
due process - basically slaves would remain slaves in non-slave states and slaves could not sue because
they were not citizens



Plessy v. Ferguson Ans- a 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so
long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal



United States v. Miller Ans- 1939; ruled that the National Firearms Act of 1934 was constitutional,
allowing federal govt to ban interstate shipping of some unregistered guns (because it was unrelated to
state militias)



Korematsu v. US Ans- 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing
for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and
agreed to pay $20,000 2 each survivor



Brown v Board ofEducation of Topeka (1954) Ans- Supreme Court ruling that overturned the Plessy v.
Ferguson Supreme Court Case of 1896. "Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of public
education



Mapp v. Ohio Ans- Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized
illegally cannot be used in court)



Gideon v. Wainwright Ans- A person who cannot afford an attorney may have one appointed by the
government



Sherbert vs. Verner Ans- Unemployment may not be denied on religious basis

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 16, 2023
Number of pages
4
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$9.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
CertifiedGrades Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
145
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
61
Documents
8739
Last sold
1 month ago
High Scores

Hi there! Welcome to my online tutoring store, your ultimate destination for A+ rated educational resources! My meticulously curated collection of documents is designed to support your learning journey. Each resource has been carefully revised and verified to ensure top-notch quality, empowering you to excel academically. Feel free to reach out to consult with me on any subject matter—I'm here to help you thrive!

3.9

38 reviews

5
21
4
6
3
2
2
3
1
6

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions