Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Ethics, Technology and Engineering: an introduction (USE)

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
14
Pages
11
Uploaded on
13-06-2016
Written in
2015/2016

Summary chapters: 1,2,3,5,6,8,9 of Ethics, Technology and Engineering: an introduction of Ibo van de Poel and Lambèr Royakkers. 0SAB0

Institution
Course

Content preview

1 The responsibilities of engineers
Active responsibility: before something happened. You must act so to avoid undesired consequences
and realize positive consequences.
Ideals: ideas/strivings which are particularly motivating and inspiring. It is typical that they aim at
achieving an optimum/maximum.
Professional ideals: are closely allied to a profession or can only be aspired by carrying out the
profession. Different kinds:
- Technological enthusiasm: wanting to develop new technological possibilities and take up
technological challenges.
- Effectiveness: extent to which an established goal is achieved.
- Efficiency: ratio between the goal achieved and the effort required.
- Contributing to human welfare, for instance health, the environment and sustainability.

Passive responsibility: after something (undesirable) has happened. You can have accountability
(being held to account for/justify one’s actions towards others) or blameworthiness (it is proper to
blame someone for his actions or the consequences of the actions, you are blameworthy if 4
conditions apply: wrong-doing, causal contribution, foreseeability and freedom).

Role responsibility: based on the role one has or plays in a certain situation.
Moral responsibility: based on the obligations, norms and duties that arise form moral
considerations.
Professional responsibility: based on your role as a professional engineer, as in far it stays within the
limits of what is morally allowed.

Separatism: scientists and engineers should apply the technical inputs, but appropriate management
and political organs should make the value decisions. Well illustrated by the tripartite model:
- Politicians, policy makers and managers establish the objectives for engineering projects and
products and make available resources without intervening in engineering matters.
- Engineers, who take care of the designing, developing, creating and executing
- Users, who make use of the various technologies.
Engineers can only be held responsible for the technical creation of products.
Hired gun: someone who is willing to carry out any task from his employer without moral scruples.

Technocracy: government by experts. It is undemocratic and paternalistic (certain group of
individuals make (moral) decisions for others on the assumptions that they know better what is good
for them).
Whistle-blowing: employee discloses certain abuses in a company in which he is employed without
the consent of his superiors and in order to remedy these abuses and/or to warn the public about
these abuses.

Actor: any person/group that can make a decision how to act and that can act on that decision:
- Developers and producers of technology.
- Users: use technology and formulate certain wishes or requirements for the functioning of
the technology.
- Regulators: government, who formulate rules/regulations that the products have to meet.
They all have certain interests; things they strive for.

Stakeholders: actors that have an interest in the development of a technology, but cannot
necessarily influence the direction of technological development.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
1,2,3,5,6,8,9
Uploaded on
June 13, 2016
Number of pages
11
Written in
2015/2016
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$4.84
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
9 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Kp2022 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
305
Member since
10 year
Number of followers
210
Documents
62
Last sold
3 months ago

3.4

25 reviews

5
5
4
7
3
9
2
1
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions