European Union Law
Problem 7
H17
Objective 1
What are the rules regarding to the prohibition of cartels in Europe
Intro
Cartels - art. 101 TFEU
Jurisdictional Aspects
The concept of ‘Undertaking’
The ‘Single Economic Unit’ Doctrine
Forms of Collusion
Agreements
Tacit Acquiescence (stilzwijgende instemming) versus Unilateral Conduct (eenzijdig)
Concerted practices (onderling afgestemd) and parallel conduct (overeenkomstige
gedraging) (niet zeker of we dit moeten kennen geen relevante cases)
(Potential) Effect on Trade between Member States
Restriction by Object: European ‘Per Se rules’
Restrictions by effect
Article 101 (3): Exemptions through Pro-competitive Effects
Objective 2
What are the rules on abuse …
The ‘Market’: Product and Geographic Dimensions
Market Dominance
General considerations
Collective dominance
Abuse of Market Dominance
Article 102 (2) (a) and ‘Predatory Pricing’
Article 102 (2) (b) and ‘refusal to supply’
Article 102(2)(c) and ‘Discretionary Pricing’
Article 102(2)(d) and ‘Tying or Bundling’
Objective Justification: Apparently Abusive Behaviour
Objective 3
Solve the case
Voor vervolguitwerkingen : of Denise Lubrano op FB
Voeg ook de fb groep toe: rechtgeleerdheid uitwerkingen erasmus universiteit rotterdam (openbaar)
Problem 7
H17
Objective 1
What are the rules regarding to the prohibition of cartels in Europe
Intro
Cartels - art. 101 TFEU
Jurisdictional Aspects
The concept of ‘Undertaking’
The ‘Single Economic Unit’ Doctrine
Forms of Collusion
Agreements
Tacit Acquiescence (stilzwijgende instemming) versus Unilateral Conduct (eenzijdig)
Concerted practices (onderling afgestemd) and parallel conduct (overeenkomstige
gedraging) (niet zeker of we dit moeten kennen geen relevante cases)
(Potential) Effect on Trade between Member States
Restriction by Object: European ‘Per Se rules’
Restrictions by effect
Article 101 (3): Exemptions through Pro-competitive Effects
Objective 2
What are the rules on abuse …
The ‘Market’: Product and Geographic Dimensions
Market Dominance
General considerations
Collective dominance
Abuse of Market Dominance
Article 102 (2) (a) and ‘Predatory Pricing’
Article 102 (2) (b) and ‘refusal to supply’
Article 102(2)(c) and ‘Discretionary Pricing’
Article 102(2)(d) and ‘Tying or Bundling’
Objective Justification: Apparently Abusive Behaviour
Objective 3
Solve the case
Voor vervolguitwerkingen : of Denise Lubrano op FB
Voeg ook de fb groep toe: rechtgeleerdheid uitwerkingen erasmus universiteit rotterdam (openbaar)
