with complete solution
What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the
Constitution?
It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed.
It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms.
It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power.
It might be used later to free enslaved people in the west.
It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed.
According to the Seventh Amendment, people who sue companies for not paying
them are guaranteed
payment for their work.
representation by lawyers.
trials by jury.
double jeopardy.
trials by jury.
Federalists believed in the separation of powers because they wanted
individuals to have separate rights.
states to have separate rights.
the central government to avoid monarchy.
the nation to elect a strong executive.
the central government to avoid monarchy.
Probable cause protects people's rights by making sure that
the police can do their job.
public property can be searched easily.
people receive legal representation.
private property is searched only when reasonable.
private property is searched only when reasonable.
The Anti-Federalists' main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it
had no bill of rights.
had no provision for a militia.
did not divide the central government.
did not have a judiciary.
had no bill of rights.
Under the Eighth Amendment, a person charged with a crime
has the option of hiring a lawyer.
has to pay $20 to a jury.
does not have to pay excessive bail.
does not have to testify in court.
does not have to pay excessive bail.
The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution protects the rights of
all citizens.
people who are suspected of crimes.