Cftehrcetoe
nConsidQctian
4entOn
2 lems of the
Contract Contract - express
Gid lmpiked
Contract toctors
Rened1es
Conract
What is the pant oe Contract law?
- Requaees relaiansihis
- Recyuoes cisputes
Reguuates haw controcts are made
- Requlares the terms ce the Contract
-Kequotes haw Contracts end
Aprome or set of promises which the law wil enforce
Sr trederic Pollocu
"Riqhnts ard obligatins enforcaabie in the couts
"Dnaces for breach oe coMOct (homal rene
r specihe perforvance (camy Qut agrcomene)
, What is a conioact?
’ No deeintion in
Erqlish iaw
legcly brnding pronise'
Petty unversaty agreed prrcipies
Genera Rrnipies
arties NE reoch an agreenent (Offer +
*Aqreement. Must be Supported by cnsiderationoceptance)
t MuSt be intenbion to create
iegal relatioNS
Rareemet iS(S Compnsed cÇ2 major elemeits?
-Ofer i wi lngness to Contíact on spEcfc tenmi
-kceptace
CCter
-mode iMth inention to become egally bidirg Cnie acepted
- farty wno maues an sffer ferar
- Yarty vwho recieves an afer : offeree
Objecve test
- | 0 reasonabie person wouc believe that the offec
hoá the intenmiün to be binaug then this coud be suuen
Voran v Unvershy Colege Saltoro (i994)
Doffered Moran o pi¯te to Study pnyotherapy for the
ext acodemic year. Offer iuas üccapiea by Maan.
Houever, in realty , the affer was a cienal erroc Oniy
rewealed to moran in Sepember. Moran Quit job in London
CoA ConmOct exSed (cbj test) reieLed Compensation.
0T Afica ine Ltd v Vcuecs_ pie (1996)
Solictor msoueny seHed claim for EsO,00 Kather than
$I55,000. Cbjechive
echve test
test - qenwe ofer
nConsidQctian
4entOn
2 lems of the
Contract Contract - express
Gid lmpiked
Contract toctors
Rened1es
Conract
What is the pant oe Contract law?
- Requaees relaiansihis
- Recyuoes cisputes
Reguuates haw controcts are made
- Requlares the terms ce the Contract
-Kequotes haw Contracts end
Aprome or set of promises which the law wil enforce
Sr trederic Pollocu
"Riqhnts ard obligatins enforcaabie in the couts
"Dnaces for breach oe coMOct (homal rene
r specihe perforvance (camy Qut agrcomene)
, What is a conioact?
’ No deeintion in
Erqlish iaw
legcly brnding pronise'
Petty unversaty agreed prrcipies
Genera Rrnipies
arties NE reoch an agreenent (Offer +
*Aqreement. Must be Supported by cnsiderationoceptance)
t MuSt be intenbion to create
iegal relatioNS
Rareemet iS(S Compnsed cÇ2 major elemeits?
-Ofer i wi lngness to Contíact on spEcfc tenmi
-kceptace
CCter
-mode iMth inention to become egally bidirg Cnie acepted
- farty wno maues an sffer ferar
- Yarty vwho recieves an afer : offeree
Objecve test
- | 0 reasonabie person wouc believe that the offec
hoá the intenmiün to be binaug then this coud be suuen
Voran v Unvershy Colege Saltoro (i994)
Doffered Moran o pi¯te to Study pnyotherapy for the
ext acodemic year. Offer iuas üccapiea by Maan.
Houever, in realty , the affer was a cienal erroc Oniy
rewealed to moran in Sepember. Moran Quit job in London
CoA ConmOct exSed (cbj test) reieLed Compensation.
0T Afica ine Ltd v Vcuecs_ pie (1996)
Solictor msoueny seHed claim for EsO,00 Kather than
$I55,000. Cbjechive
echve test
test - qenwe ofer
