Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary - H573/01 Philosophy of Religion - Cosmological Argument

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Geüpload op
15-07-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Notes covering the H573/01 Philosophy of Religion topic of the Cosmological Argument, with explanation and notes covering all the necessary content for the exams.

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Dillon Precious The Cosmological Argument


The Cosmological Argument:

 The Cosmological Argument is one of the oldest arguments to prove the existence of God,
and essentially based on the idea of cause and effect. It tries to satisfy a need to explain the
universe’s existence, and places God beyond the universe.
 Briefly the argument is based on the claim that everything existing in the universe exists
because it was causes by something else; that “something” was itself also caused by
something else. However, it is necessary for something to have started it all off – something
which did not and was not itself caused / created. That “something” is God, according to
Thomas Aquinas.
o This argument is:
 A Posteriori.
 Synthetic.
 Inductive.
 Ockham’s Razor: the idea that the simplest idea is often the correct one.
 (A) Posteriori arguments: based on evidence which already exists. The arguments are post
evidence. A Posteriori statements do not contain the conclusion but argue to a conclusion
based on evidence.
 Deductive Arguments: Given the premises, there can be no other conclusion.
o The conclusion is implied by the premises – flows directly from it. It is necessary.
 Premise 1 – My birthday is in June
 Premise 2 – It is my birthday today
 Conclusion – We are in June.
 Inductive arguments: Given the circumstances, the conclusion becomes a statement of what
is the most probable.
o Therefore, one can agree with the premises, yet still disagree with the conclusion.
o The premises support he conclusion, but do not make it necessary.
 Premise 1 – Many Buddhist people practice Yoga
 Premise 2 – John is a Buddhist
 Conclusion – John practices Yoga.

Thomas Aquinas:

 Thomas Aquinas’s five ways:
o First three are cosmological, the fourth is ontological and the fifth is teleological.
o The first three are as follows:
 Motion
 Cause
 Contingency
 Causation: He believed that you could prove God’s existence through A Posteriori. This was
one of his key ideas, as he believed that everything had a first cause (God).
 When Thomas Aquinas was developing the Cosmological Argument in his book Summa
Theologica he drew upon Plato for inspiration.
 Plato said that change is brought about by something external to the subject.
 There is a self-moving principle from what all change and motion originate.
o This principle is the soul (for Plato). It is the soul that is responsible for the world as
it is.
 Aquinas believed that God had inspired him, even though most of his ideas were plagiarised
from Plato.

, Dillon Precious The Cosmological Argument


Saint Thomas Anselm:

 “God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”
 If you can think of something greater than “God” than by definition that must be “God.”
 However, this does not tell us anything about the nature of God. Also, it is very subjective, as
it depends on what your greatest conceived opinion is.

Synthetic and Analytic:

 Analytic: something that is true by definition – e.g., my dad is male.
o The truth is in the definition of the subject.
 Synthetic: the truth can only be determined by experience / observation – e.g., mechanics
are good at fixing things.
o The truth is not in the definition of the subject, it needs to be proven.
 Inductive = synthetic = a posteriori
 Deductive = analytic = a priori
 The universe needs an explanation. It cannot be explained without reference to causes
outside of itself, as it is contingent.
 Contingent vs necessary:
o Contingent: depends on something else for its existence / truth. It could be false.
o Necessary: does not depend on anything else to exist / be true. To deny it would be
a contradiction. It could not be false.
 Necessary existence, basically, it must exist and does not rely on anything
else.
o If the universe is contingent, then it relies on something else to exist. That
“something else” must come before the universe. If X causes Y – then X must exist
first, or Y would not exist.
o The universe cannot be self-causing, as it is contingent. Therefore, only the existence
of a first, necessary, uncaused cause can explain its origin.
 The cosmological argument wants a whole, complete explanation.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
15 juli 2023
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$7.61
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
dillon43

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
dillon43 Darrick Wood Secondary School
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
-
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
26
Laatst verkocht
-

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen