ABF 2
Flow rate(%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
100%
80%
60%
Flow rate(%)
40%
20%
0%
100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 38% 25% 13% 0%
amount of water in the basin(%)
Phase 1 Imaginary Line phase2 phase 3 Phase 4 Mean Curve
Figure 14: ABF 2 Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
In the case of ABF 2, the mean curve is very closer to the imaginary line. When the amount of
water in the basin is greater than 50%, then all the curves follow the imaginary line. That means
whenever the amount of water in the basin is more than 50%, the flow rate is stable.
49
, ABF 3
Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
100%
80%
Flow rate(%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 38% 25% 13% 0%
amont of water in the basin(%)
Phase 1 Imaginary Line Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Mean Curve
Figure 15: ABF 3 Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
.
In ABF 3, phase 1 and phase 4 curves show inconsistency. While mean curve is very close to
imaginary line, which shows that it, follows our hypothesis.
50
Flow rate(%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
100%
80%
60%
Flow rate(%)
40%
20%
0%
100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 38% 25% 13% 0%
amount of water in the basin(%)
Phase 1 Imaginary Line phase2 phase 3 Phase 4 Mean Curve
Figure 14: ABF 2 Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
In the case of ABF 2, the mean curve is very closer to the imaginary line. When the amount of
water in the basin is greater than 50%, then all the curves follow the imaginary line. That means
whenever the amount of water in the basin is more than 50%, the flow rate is stable.
49
, ABF 3
Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
100%
80%
Flow rate(%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 38% 25% 13% 0%
amont of water in the basin(%)
Phase 1 Imaginary Line Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Mean Curve
Figure 15: ABF 3 Flow rate (%) vs Amount of water in the basin(%)
.
In ABF 3, phase 1 and phase 4 curves show inconsistency. While mean curve is very close to
imaginary line, which shows that it, follows our hypothesis.
50