Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Civil litigation: disclosure

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
5
Geüpload op
29-07-2023
Geschreven in
2021/2022

All the answers to help you get a distinction like me

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

DR W9



Disclosure and Inspecti on
Disclosure


Disclosure is the process of providing your opponent with a list of documents.
It is not inspection - this is a separate process where your opponent has a right to actually see certain disclosable documents.

 You are listing the documents, in your control, that could be relevant to your case – whether to your advantage or not
 The other party then has the choice to select which documents they wish to view
 Often the list you create will have identical documents the other party has e.g. an exchange of letters between the
parties’ solicitors – they will therefore not ask you to view this documents
 Main purpose: of the disclosure and inspection stage is to enable the parties to better evaluate the strengths of their
opponent’s case in advance of the trial

Disclosure report
 A disclosure report is essentially a document which summarises the documents to be disclosed in a
particular case, where these are located, and provides estimates of the likely costs involved in giving
standard disclosure.
o It is verified by a statement of truth.
 It is made in Form N263 (Appendix A(11))
 For Multi-Track cases, CPR 31.5(3) requires all parties to file and serve a disclosure report not less than
14 days before the first Case Management Conference.
 Part 31 disclosure does not apply to small claims (CPR 31.1(2))

Definition of disclosure A party discloses a document by stating that the document exists or has existed (CPR 31.2)
Consequences of a Where a party fails to disclose or allow inspection of a document:
failure to disclose  Unable to rely on the document:
o You may not rely on that document at trial unless the court permits this.
CPR 31.21  Case may be struck out:
o A party who fails to disclose a document that harms/is adverse to his case in response to an
order for specific disclosure may find that his case is struck out.
 Costs Penalties

Subsequent use of Party may only use document disclosed for the purposes of the case in which it has been disclosed unless:
disclosed documents  document has been read or referred to during public hearing (e.g. at trial); or
CPR 31.22  court grants permission; or
 party who disclosed document and person to whom document belongs consents
Non-party disclosure Once proceedings have commended, a party can apply for disclosure to a non-party to enable them to
resolve issues in the case.
CPR 31.17  This is used where the party has indicated a document is no longer in his possession (part 3 of
list).
 If the person who now has the document will not hand it over voluntary, the opposing party
who wants to see it can apply for an order for non-party disclosure under r31.17.
 Application for non-party disclosure must be supported by evidence and will only be granted if:
 the documents in question are likely to support the applicant’s case or adversely affect
another party’s case; or
 disclosure is necessary either to save costs or to dispose fairly of the case

Pre-action disclosure Where party does not know whether or not to issue proceedings without more info – they can apply
against the intended defendant for pre-action disclosure under r31.16.


In the exam, you are expected to analyse documents but ALSO to identify from Statements of Case which
documents should be INCLUDED.



1

, DR W9
IS DISCLOSURE NECESSARY? FOLLOW THE STEPS.


STEP 1
Is it a document?
 CPR 31.4: A document is anything in/on which information of any kind is recorded. The key question is, does material
contain useful information? If yes, then it will be document.

o PD 31B, para 1: Includes electronic documents. “any document held in electronic form. It includes, for example,
email and other electronic communications such as text messages and voicemail, word-processed documents and
databases, and documents stored on portable devices such as memory sticks and mobile phones”.


STEP 2
Should the document be disclosed?
 An order to give disclosure is limited to STANDARD DISCLOSURE (for fast track and multi-track), unless the court directs
otherwise – OR – the parties agree in writing to vary this (r31.5(1))
 CPR 31.6: Parties must disclose documents: – RAAS
 on which they rely
 which adversely affect their own case.
 which adversely affect their opponent’s case.
 which support their opponent’s case.
NB:
 Always bear in mind the case issues (what is in dispute) throughout the disclosure process only disclose those documents that are
necessary under r31.6 i.e. relevant to the issues – most cases: liability, quantum, costs not every document relevant to the case
(e.g. may only be relevant to an admitted point)
 When describing the document say HOW/WHY disclosed
o E.g. the client relies on this because it shows there was a contract, shows there was a breach of…
o But, DO NOT USE “RELEVANT” TO THE CASE – use the terminology of r31.6

STEP 3
What are the documents in the party’s control?
 CPR 31.8: The duty to disclose is limited to documents which are or have been in the control of the party. A document
was/is in party’s control if:
 it was in physical possession;
 they had a right to possession of it; and/or
 they had a right to inspect it or take copies (e.g. medical report)


STEP 4
Apply to facts
 When you apply the information to the facts:
 you must identify exactly what issues are in dispute (rather than those where the parties are in agreement), and
 state exactly WHY/HOW the document affects the case

EXAMPLES
 Statements of Case (including Claim Form): will always satisfy conditions for Standard Disclosure as party will either be
relying on it or it will be adverse to his case.

 Documents mentioned in Statements of Case: Will almost ALWAYS satisfy conditions for Standard Disclosure. Why
would parties have included in Statements of Case if not? BUT still apply to facts.
o r31.14 makes it clear that a party may inspect a document mentioned in a Statements of Case – i.e. you cannot
protect it by privilege if you include it.



2

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 juli 2023
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$4.82
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
spying_unfixed_0a

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
spying_unfixed_0a University of Law
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen