Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

MPH 6011 Final Exam 2023 with complete solution

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Cijfer
A
Geüpload op
12-08-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

MPH 6011 Final Exam 2023 with complete solution True or false: A retrospective cohort study is an observational study but a prospective cohort study is an intervention study. False What study designs are both analytic, observational studies? Retrospective and prospective cohort studies What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by cumulative incidence? relative risk What is the ratio of cumulative incidence rate in exposed compared to cumulative incidence rate in the unexposed? relative risk What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by incidence rates with person-time in the denominator? rate ratio In a cohort study, several design and implementation problems can impact the strength of the measure of association. Choose which of these problems below is least likely in a cohort study? a. information bias b. absence of temporality c. loss to follow-up d. none of the above b Among the items listed below, which design feature or bias is NOT similarly found in both case-control and cohort studies? a. both make comparisons between exposed and unexposed groups b. confounding c. both measure exposure before disease occurs d. both can have misclassification of exposure c Exposure is measured __________ disease occurrence in cohort studies. a. before b. after a In a cohort study, the association between smoking and coronary heart disease was investigated by selecting for study a group of 3000 smokers and 5000 non-smokers who were free of disease at baseline. Both groups were followed for the development of coronary heart disease. 84 smokers developed coronary heart disease and 87 non smokers did too. 4913 persons did not develop disease and did not smoke. The measure of association relating exposed to unexposed would be: (84/3000)/(87/5000)

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

MPH 6011 Final Exam 2023 with complete solution
True or false: A retrospective cohort study is an observational study but a
prospective cohort study is an intervention study.
False
What study designs are both analytic, observational studies?
Retrospective and prospective cohort studies
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and
analysis is by cumulative incidence?
relative risk
What is the ratio of cumulative incidence rate in exposed compared to cumulative
incidence rate in the unexposed?
relative risk
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and
analysis is by incidence rates with person-time in the denominator?
rate ratio
In a cohort study, several design and implementation problems can impact the
strength of the measure of association. Choose which of these problems below is
least likely in a cohort study?

a. information bias
b. absence of temporality
c. loss to follow-up
d. none of the above
b
Among the items listed below, which design feature or bias is NOT similarly
found in both case-control and cohort studies?

a. both make comparisons between exposed and unexposed groups
b. confounding
c. both measure exposure before disease occurs
d. both can have misclassification of exposure
c
Exposure is measured __________ disease occurrence in cohort studies.

a. before
b. after
a
In a cohort study, the association between smoking and coronary heart disease
was investigated by selecting for study a group of 3000 smokers and 5000 non-
smokers who were free of disease at baseline. Both groups were followed for the
development of coronary heart disease. 84 smokers developed coronary heart
disease and 87 non smokers did too. 4913 persons did not develop disease and
did not smoke. The measure of association relating exposed to unexposed would
be:
(84/3000)/(87/5000)

, True or false: Attributable risk tells us how much disease can be prevented if
exposure is removed from the population.
True
In a 20 year cohort study with 30 cases of heart disease in exposed group and
54,308 person years, while the unexposed group had 60 cases and 51,477 person-
years. The measure of association showed 0.47. The best interpretation of this
finding was:

a. exposed group had a greater risk of heart disease than unexposed group
b. unexposed group had reduced risk of heart disease compared to exposed
group
c. exposed group had a reduced risk of heart disease compared to the unexposed
group
c
Which of the following is an advantage of cohort studies?

a. can examine multiple outcomes from a single exposure
b. can match on confounders
c. can avoid recall bias
d. can enroll cases at beginning of study
a
True or false: A case control study can be embedded within a cohort?
True
What are the two examples of case-control design embedded within a cohort?
Nested case control and case-cohort
What is the design feature unique to experimental studies?
Randomization
True or false: The purpose of randomization is to eliminate conscious bias by
provider on patient selection for treatment group.
True
What are the two reasons why randomization is preferred to non-randomized
studies?
1. eliminates conscious bias by provider on patient selection for treatment group
2. averages unknown confounders and makes groups similar
The primary purpose of a double blind study is to:

a. achieve comparability of treated and untreated subjects
b. reduce efforts of sampling error
c. avoid provider bias and participant bias
d. avoid participant bias and increase recruitment
c
Randomized controlled trials do not include which design:

a. randomization
b. blinding

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 augustus 2023
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$12.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
katoinyambi96 stuvia
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
49
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
31
Documenten
1267
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden

4.5

6 beoordelingen

5
4
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen