Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

OCR AS English Literature paper 1 June 2023 question paper H072/01: Shakespeare and poetry pre-1900

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
39
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-10-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

AS Level English Literature H072/01: Shakespeare and poetry pre-1900 Mark Scheme for June 2023

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Shakespeare and poetry pre-1900




GCE

AS Level


English Literature

H072/01: Shakespeare and poetry pre-1900


Mark Scheme for June 2023




Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,Shakespeare and poetry pre-1900




OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of
qualifications to meet the needs of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications
include AS/A Levels, Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals,
Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in
areas such as IT, business, languages, teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills.

It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the
needs of students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is
invested back into the establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and
support, which keep pace with the changing needs of today’s society.

This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements
of the examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking
commenced.

All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated.

Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report
on the examination.


© OCR 2023




Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,H072/01 Mark Scheme June 2023

MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
PREPARATION FOR MARKING
RM ASSESSOR
1. Make sure that you have accessed and completed the relevant training packages for on-screen marking: RM Assessor Assessor Online
Training; OCR Essential Guide to Marking.

2. Make sure that you have read and understood the mark scheme and the question paper for this unit. These are posted on the
RM Cambridge Assessment Support Portal http://www.rm.com/support/ca

3. Log-in to RM Assessor and mark the required number of practice responses (“scripts”) and the number of required standardisation
responses.

YOU MUST MARK 10 PRACTICE AND 10 STANDARDISATION RESPONSES BEFORE YOU CAN BE APPROVED TO MARK LIVE
SCRIPTS.

MARKING

1. Mark strictly to the mark scheme.

2. Marks awarded must relate directly to the marking criteria.

3. The schedule of dates is very important. It is essential that you meet the RM Assessor 50% and 100% (traditional 40% Batch 1 and
100% Batch 2) deadlines. If you experience problems, you must contact your Team Leader (Supervisor) without delay.


4. If you are in any doubt about applying the mark scheme, consult your Team Leader by telephone or the RM Assessor messaging
system, or by email.

5. Crossed Out Responses
Where a candidate has crossed out a response and provided a clear alternative then the crossed out response is not marked. Where no
alternative response has been provided, examiners may give candidates the benefit of the doubt and mark the crossed out response where
legible.

2

, H072/01 Mark Scheme June 2023
Rubric Error Responses – Optional Questions
Where candidates have a choice of question across a whole paper or a whole section and have provided more answers than required,
then all responses are marked and the highest mark allowable within the rubric is given. Enter a mark for each question answered into RM
assessor, which will select the highest mark from those awarded. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate has penalised
themselves by attempting more questions than necessary in the time allowed.)

Multiple Choice Question Responses
When a multiple choice question has only a single, correct response and a candidate provides two responses (even if one of these
responses is correct), then no mark should be awarded (as it is not possible to determine which was the first response selected by the
candidate).
When a question requires candidates to select more than one option/multiple options, then local marking arrangements need to ensure
consistency of approach.

Contradictory Responses
When a candidate provides contradictory responses, then no mark should be awarded, even if one of the answers is correct.

Short Answer Questions (requiring only a list by way of a response, usually worth only one mark per response)
Where candidates are required to provide a set number of short answer responses then only the set number of responses should be
marked. The response space should be marked from left to right on each line and then line by line until the required number of responses
have been considered. The remaining responses should not then be marked. Examiners will have to apply judgement as to whether a
‘second response’ on a line is a development of the ‘first response’, rather than a separate, discrete response. (The underlying
assumption is that the candidate is attempting to hedge their bets and therefore getting undue benefit rather than engaging with the
question and giving the most relevant/correct responses.)

Short Answer Questions (requiring a more developed response, worth two or more marks)
If the candidates are required to provide a description of, say, three items or factors and four items or factors are provided, then mark on a
similar basis – that is downwards (as it is unlikely in this situation that a candidate will provide more than one response in each section of
the response space.)

Longer Answer Questions (requiring a developed response)
Where candidates have provided two (or more) responses to a medium or high tariff question which only required a single (developed)
response and not crossed out the first response, then only the first response should be marked. Examiners will need to apply professional
judgement as to whether the second (or a subsequent) response is a ‘new start’ or simply a poorly expressed continuation of the first
response.

3

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 oktober 2023
Aantal pagina's
39
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$18.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
vinnz Arizona Christian University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
463
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
293
Documenten
777
Laatst verkocht
2 weken geleden
Latest official Past papers

Are you ready for the Mocks? Do you have any mocks or your teachers threatening to set up tests? Some of them used to give you a predicted grade for uni? I GOT YOU. All you need is revision from past paper and you are set for the exam. Get it today. Sending success your way. Don't worry. Most of them will be from past papers. I have the 2023 ones which will probably be used. Get it, revise, and practice. Exams don't have to be stressful. ACE YOUR MOCKS!

Lees meer Lees minder
4.1

84 beoordelingen

5
49
4
16
3
6
2
4
1
9

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen