Running Head: ETHICS IN HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
1
Ethics in human subjects in research
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
, ETHICS IN HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
2
How well the precepts of the Belmont Report affect the Common Rule and the Correlations
Between Belmont and CIOMS
Introduction
The Belmont Report was created by the National Commission for protection of human
subjects of Biomedical and behavioral research. The report started its deliberations in 1978 and
aimed at ensuring that the research activities performed by various bodies would follow the
ethical principles provided. The report, therefore, provides a summary of the moral rules and
regulations which people should use when performing their research using human subjects. The
report, thus, identifies the most critical ethical considerations as respect for people, beneficence,
and justice (Fischer IV, 2015). On the other hand, the Common Rule was established in 1981 and
aimed at ruling on the ethics applied during biomedical and behavioral research when using the
human subjects. All the government-funded research activities have to apply the Common Rule
as the baseline, and all bodies of research including learning institutions and individuals align
their research activities with the statements of the Common Rule. The paper presents a critique
on the way in which the Common Rule embraces the ethical considerations provided by the
Belmont Report in its application.
Belmont Report vs. the Common Rule
In the US, the current system protecting human subjects has influence from the Belmont
Report. The Belmont report advises the IRBs on the studies that should be done while the
common rule has force of law absent in the Belmont Report. In this case, the report outlines the
ethical considerations which all researchers should apply when using human subjects. However,
1
Ethics in human subjects in research
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
, ETHICS IN HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
2
How well the precepts of the Belmont Report affect the Common Rule and the Correlations
Between Belmont and CIOMS
Introduction
The Belmont Report was created by the National Commission for protection of human
subjects of Biomedical and behavioral research. The report started its deliberations in 1978 and
aimed at ensuring that the research activities performed by various bodies would follow the
ethical principles provided. The report, therefore, provides a summary of the moral rules and
regulations which people should use when performing their research using human subjects. The
report, thus, identifies the most critical ethical considerations as respect for people, beneficence,
and justice (Fischer IV, 2015). On the other hand, the Common Rule was established in 1981 and
aimed at ruling on the ethics applied during biomedical and behavioral research when using the
human subjects. All the government-funded research activities have to apply the Common Rule
as the baseline, and all bodies of research including learning institutions and individuals align
their research activities with the statements of the Common Rule. The paper presents a critique
on the way in which the Common Rule embraces the ethical considerations provided by the
Belmont Report in its application.
Belmont Report vs. the Common Rule
In the US, the current system protecting human subjects has influence from the Belmont
Report. The Belmont report advises the IRBs on the studies that should be done while the
common rule has force of law absent in the Belmont Report. In this case, the report outlines the
ethical considerations which all researchers should apply when using human subjects. However,
