Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary articles Leadership and Organizations

Beoordeling
3.7
(3)
Verkocht
10
Pagina's
45
Geüpload op
15-12-2017
Geschreven in
2017/2018

All articles of the course Leadership and Organisations from the VU Amsterdam. Some summaries might be better than others, but all important points are covered. Saves a lot of time reading the many article pages. Good luck studying! Goleman, Daniel (1998). “What Makes a Leader,” Harvard Business Review, 76, 93-102. Goffee, R. & Jones, G. (2000). Why should anyone be led by you? Harvard Business Review, 78 (5), 62-70. Van Vugt, M., Johnson, D., Kaiser, R., & O'Gorman, R. (2008). Evolution and the social psychology of leadership: The mismatch hypothesis. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182-196. Van Prooijen, J.-W., & De Vries, R. E. (2016). Organizational conspiracy beliefs: Implications for leadership styles and employee outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 479-491. Hamstra, M. R. W., Van Yperen, N. W., Wisse, B., & Sassenberg, K. (2011). Transformational-transactional leadership styles and followers’ regulatory focus: Fit reduces followers’ turnover intentions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 182-186. Mayer, D. M., Bardes, M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2008). Do servant leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 180–197. de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 809-821. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality, 36(6), 556-563. Mathieu, C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83-88. Raymond, S. (2016) Dehumanization, Racial Minority and Female Leadership: An Analysis of Global Trends. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 261-269. Yang, W., Jin, S., He, S., Fan, Q., and Zhu, Y. (2015). The impact of power on humanity: self-dehumanization in powerlessness. PLOS ONE 10:e0125721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125721 Stouten, J., Van Dijke, Marius & De Cremer, D. (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11, 1-6. Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H.M., Suckow, K., Grandey, A. (2000). Doing justice to workplace emotion. In N. Ashkanasy, Härtel, C., & Zerbe, W. (Eds.), Emotions in the Workplace: Research, Theory, and Practice. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2012, January 9). Differentiating the Effects of Status and Power: A Justice Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. Brebels, L.G.G., De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Hiel, A. van (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22 (SI), S47-S58. Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., De Cremer, D. and Mayer, D.M. (2013). When leaders choose to be fair: follower belongingness needs and leader empathy influences leaders' adherence to procedural fairness rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 605-613. Zapata, C. P., Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L. L. (2013). Social exchange from the supervisor’s perspective: Employee trustworthiness as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 1–12. van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J.T., Kay, A.C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (2015). A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy and government. Political Psychology, 36, 93-110. Wisse, B., & Rus, D. (2012). Leader self-concept and self-interested behavior: The moderating role of power. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11, 40–48. Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., and Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: a social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 160-193. -- UNTIL PAGE 177 Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149-166.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Leadership and Organisations VU 2017-2018
College 1
Why should anyone be led by you?
R. Goffee, G. Jones
A small history:
Talking about leadership since the time of Plato
18th century – rationalist revolution, (Voltaire) people can control their destiny by
application of reason.
th
19 century – believe in progress and believe in perfectibility of man.
end 19th century – Freud and Max Weber – current search for good leadership consequence
of their work. Freud: unconscious responsible for big part of behaviour. Weber:
technical rationality = rationality without morality. Technical rationality shows
especially in bureaucracy. Bureaucracies are frightening cause they dehumanize
people. – Hilter’s bureaucracy.
Weber: charismatic leaders can resist bureaucratisation.
20th century – There are charismatic positive but also negative leaders (Hiltler, Stalin).
scepticism about power of reasoning and continuous progress of man. Interest in
concept of leadership. First research 1920: trait theory.
Now – contingency theory: leadership depends on a particular situation. In the article a mix
of all theories is used.
4 qualities
Everybody agrees that leaders need: vision, energy, authority and strategic direction.
inspirational leaders have 4 more (unexpected) qualities:
1) Selective show of their weakness. Showing some vulnerability to be approachable and
human.
2) Rely on intuition to feel the best timing and course of their actions. Collect and interpret soft
data.
3) Leading with tough empathy. Empathize with employees and care about them, but staying
realistic.
4) Show their differences. Know and show what makes them unique.
All 4 qualities necessary to be an inspirational leader. One or two not sufficient.
Mix of 4 qualities important
1) Weakness
Showing that you are genuine, approachable and humane.
If you don’t show weakness the world may also invent one for you. Showing one will prevent
something worse.
Exposing weakness establishes: Trust, A collaborative atmosphere, Solidarity between employees and
leaders
Pick a weakness carefully: no fatal flaw weakness (that is central for your professional role).
A weakness that can be considered as strength is possible (perfectionism).
Weakness should be perceived as real.
2) intuition

, Feel what’s going on.
Sometimes hard to judge how far you can go without losing followers.
Be careful not to attribute your own ideas to others (projection).
The feeling should always undergo a reality check.
3) tough empathy
Give people what they need, not what they want.
Respect for the individual and the task.
Commitment is important, people feel if you care about the job or not.
4) dare to be different
Capitalize what’s unique about oneself.
Use differences to keep a social distance.

Difference like: dress style, expertise, loyality, handshake.
Inspirational leaders use the differences to stimulate others to perform better. Followers push
themselves if the leader is a bit distant.
Don’t create too much distant – than its impossible to be a good sensor and identify and care – lose
followers.
Leadership in action
The four qualities should be part of someone’s personality. Use the four qualities in such a way that
they match with who you are. Be yourself with more skills.
Can female leaders be true to themselves?
Fewer women than men in management positions. Many women try to blend in with the men – way
of talking, way of dressing etc. But then she’s not seen as potential leader – not showing her real self
and promoting differences.
A second option is a organisation of all the woman to demand opportunities and equality, but often
there is no time to do so.
Third: woman use the stereotypes, but the danger is that if further nurtures the stereotype view and
prevents other women to get rid of them
Myths about leadership
1) Everyone can be a leader: No.
Many don’t have the knowledge or authenticity.
2) Leaders deliver business results – sometimes
Depends on the type of company and the time
3) Leaders are great coaches – not often
Often inspire others by their vision not coaching abilities.
4) People who get to the top are leaders – not necessarily
Leaders are people with followers independent of rank. People high in rank don’t have to be
good leaders (could e.g. be for political reasons)


What makes a leader?
D. Goleman
IQ and technical skills are important, but emotional intelligence is the sine qua non of leadership.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
15 december 2017
Bestand laatst geupdate op
18 december 2017
Aantal pagina's
45
Geschreven in
2017/2018
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$5.37
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 10 studenten

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
7 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

3.7

3 beoordelingen

5
0
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
heleenrosa Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
10
Lid sinds
8 jaar
Aantal volgers
10
Documenten
1
Laatst verkocht
3 jaar geleden

3.7

3 beoordelingen

5
0
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen