Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary articles for exam 2 'Adolescent Development'

Rating
4.5
(2)
Sold
4
Pages
4
Uploaded on
10-03-2018
Written in
2017/2018

I have tried to summarize the articles for the second exam of the subject 'adolescent development'. However, English is not my first language and the summary may therefore have some flaws. This summary contains the following articles: - LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147. - Lansu, T. A. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Karremans, J. C. (2014). Adolescents’ selective visual attention for high-status peers: The role of perceiver status and gender. Child Development, 85, 421-428. - Savin-Williams, R.C., & Cohen, K.M. (2015). Developmental trajectories and milestones of lesbian, gay, and bisexual young people, International Review of Psychiatry, 27(5), 357-366, DOI: 10.3109/.2015.1093465 - Baams, L. Dubas, J.S., & van Aken, M.A.G. (2017). Comprehensive sexuality education as a longitudinal predicotr of LGBTQ name-calling and perceived willingness to intervene in school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 931-942.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Summary articles exam 2 ‘Adolescent
development’
Developmental changes in the priority of perceived
status in childhood and adolescence
Goal of this study: To understand the degree to which children and adolescents prioritize reputational
status over other important areas of their social and academic lives, and how this phenomenon varies
across development.
Findings:
- Developmental changes:
o As expected, the priority of peer reputation increased from childhood into
adolescence, peaked in the late middle school and early high school years, and then
leveled off.
 Why? As children become adolescents, they increasingly rely on peers for
social comparison and emotional support.
o Adolescents often prioritized status over romantic interests.
 Why? Serious romantic interests do not emerge until later in adolescence.
o There was a greater conflict when the achievement goals were academic than when
they were athletic.
 Why? Academic success becomes more negatively associated with status,
meanwhile, athletic success has a consistently positive relationship with
status.
o Positive association between age and willingness to violate accepted rules for good
behavior in favor of increasing one’s status.
 College students were away from home and having much freedom.
- Effects of gender:
o Males were generally more willing to compromise friendship, romance, and
compassion in favor of reputational status.
 Why? Females are better at balancing affiliation and perceived status and are
more concerned about how their behavior influences their relationships than
males are.
o Males were not more willing than females to compromise achievement in favor of
status.
- Effects of ethnicity: The conflict between perceived status and academic achievement was
experienced more acutely by Whites than by other ethnic groups. But: Conclusions regarding
ethnicity are limited because of the demographic characteristics of the sample.
Limitations:
- It was a hypothetical situation (you also need actual behavior).

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 10, 2018
Number of pages
4
Written in
2017/2018
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$4.15
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
8 year ago

8 year ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ellemijn_ciw_asw Wageningen University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1979
Member since
9 year
Number of followers
892
Documents
74
Last sold
1 month ago
Samenvattingen van vier verschillende studies

Hallo! - Van 2016 tot 2019 heb ik Algemene Sociale Wetenschappen gestudeerd aan de Universiteit Utrecht. - Van 2017 tot 2020 heb ik Communicatie- en Informatiewetenschappen gevolgd aan dezelfde universiteit. - Van 2020 tot 2022 heb ik de master Communication, Health & Society afgerond aan Wageningen Universiteit. - Sinds 2024 volg ik de algemene premaster aan de Theologische Universiteit Utrecht. Ik schrijf samenvattingen van de meeste vakken die ik volg, die ik vaak op Stuvia plaats. Heb je vragen over de samenvattingen, laat het me weten!

Read more Read less
4.0

490 reviews

5
118
4
254
3
103
2
10
1
5

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions