BORDER PATROL EXAM LATEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se-inherently evil-or
malum prohibitum-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a
legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax
return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish
between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still
do.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se
and malum prohibitum
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and
malum prohibitum
C) Some crimes characterized as malum in se are not inherently evil
D) Some crimes characterized as malum prohibitum are not declared by
a legislature to be an offense
E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as malum in se -
ANSWER--B
, BORDER PATROL EXAM LATEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the
company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company
hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo
damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting
under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and
its cargo was also damaged.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not
liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - ANSWER--C
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations
of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all
, BORDER PATROL EXAM LATEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would
never be said face-to-face or written formally.
What cannot be a Validly Conclusion?
A) Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-
face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in
e-mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted f - ANSWER--A
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits
under the Federal Employee
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an
eligible Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined
by this test: If the beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are
3/4 of the person's salary at the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se-inherently evil-or
malum prohibitum-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a
legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax
return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish
between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still
do.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se
and malum prohibitum
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and
malum prohibitum
C) Some crimes characterized as malum in se are not inherently evil
D) Some crimes characterized as malum prohibitum are not declared by
a legislature to be an offense
E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as malum in se -
ANSWER--B
, BORDER PATROL EXAM LATEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the
company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company
hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo
damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting
under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and
its cargo was also damaged.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not
liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - ANSWER--C
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations
of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all
, BORDER PATROL EXAM LATEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM
100+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
|ALREADY GRADED A+
e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would
never be said face-to-face or written formally.
What cannot be a Validly Conclusion?
A) Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-
face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in
e-mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted f - ANSWER--A
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits
under the Federal Employee
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an
eligible Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined
by this test: If the beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are
3/4 of the person's salary at the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are
