POLI 330N Final Exam Questions With Answers Latest Updated 2024 (GRADED)

POLI 330N Final Exam Questions With Answers Latest Updated 2024 (GRADED) The notion that politicians think practically and political scientists think abstractly is indicative of which of the following? (Points : 2) Political scientists often train politicians. Politicians often train political scientists. Political scientists and politicians are different in that the former studies the latter. Political scientists and politicians are often indistinguishable. 3. (TCO 1) Voting for someone who is charismatic but whose policies might not benefit you would be considered behavior. (Points : 2) irrational rational legitimate selfish 4. (TCO 1) is the use of public office for private gain.(Points : 2) Sovereignty Corruption Authority Legitimacy 5. (TCO 1) The notion that we acknowledge the rightful roles of our leaders or our laws is known as . (Points : 2) sovereignty authority legitimacy monarchy Course Home 6. (TCO 1) Relating concepts in a way that connects them in an empirical manner is the basis of Page building (Point . 2) scholarship theory power culture 7. (TCO 1) The term for measuring with numbers is . (Points : 2) quantifying hypothesis qualifying empirical 8. (TCO 4) The English common law stressed the rights of free and equal men and was developed on the basis of precedent set by earlier judges, known today as . (Points : 2) judgemade law judicial precedent example by trial court generated 9. (TCO 4) Which of the following issues is a civil concern? (Points : 2) Extortion Theft Divorce Trafficking 10. (TCO 4) The concept of judicial review falls under which article of the U.S. Constitution?(Points : 2) Article I: The Legislative Branch Article III: The Judicial Branch Article VI: Debts, Supremacy, Oaths Judicial review is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. 11. (TCO 4) Who nominates and approves federal judges in the U.S. court system? (Points : 2) The president and the Senate The Senate and the House The president and Speaker of the House The Senate and the Secretary of State 12. (TCO 4) Which of the following was an argument against granting the U.S. Supreme Court the power of judicial review? (Points : 2) Many feared that such a power would give the court a double check and compromise its neutrality. Some thought that such power would create untrustworthy judges. The founders argued that judicial review would lead to undue indictments by the court. Drafters of the Constitution feared that few laws would ever be set in stone. Course Home Page 13. (TCO 4) Examine the ideal role of American judges. (Points : 2) Judges should intervene frequently, interpreting the law according to their expertise and ensuring a fair trial. Judges should act as umpires, passively watching the legal drama and ruling only on disputed points of procedure. Judges should not intervene unless attorneys object, at which point they may either overrule or sustain the objection. Judges should take an active role, questioning witnesses, eliciting evidence, and commenting on procedure. 14. (TCO 4) In Lombard v. Louisiana (1963), the Warren Court supported , ruling that blacks who had refused to leave a segregated lunch counter could not be prosecuted. (Points : 2) boycotts sitins picket lines protests 15. (TCO 5) Why do the responsibilities of legislative and executive powers often overlap?(Points : 2) Separation of powers is rarely clearcut. Separation of powers is rare among industrialized nations. Separation of powers is absolute. Separation of powers grants obtuse levels of power to the executive branch.