Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

UCL Organizational Behavior Final

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
23
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
08-02-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Cognitive Dissonance - ANS when a person entertains two inconsistent thoughts, a negative feeling occurs Vicarious Dissonance - ANS when an individual places himself in a hypocrite's position and empathizes with the other's feelings Eliminating Cognitive Dissonance - ANS done by either one changing their opinion of themselves, their view of others, or their environment Induced Compliance Paradigm - ANS a person does or says something against their belief/attitude in response to a coveted reward or the threat of punishment Dissonance Shaping Human Behavior - ANS Done by either the application of insufficient punishment, or the justification of effort Insufficient Punishment - ANS mild penalties for undesirable behavior Justification of Effort - ANS makes things seem more desirable (Frat Hazing, recruiting process, compensation) External Accuracy Bias's - ANS Four: Fundamental Attribution Error, Self-Serving Bias, Halo Error, Person Sensitivity Bias Fundamental Attribution Error - ANS Attributing the behaviors of others to internal factors, without considering external factors Self-Serving Bias - ANS in others, we attribute failure to internal reasons and success to external reasons. in ourselves, we do the opposite Halo Error - ANS we tend to draw on a single characteristic when making wide-range evaluations of individuals (looks, first impression, height, etc.) Person Sensitivity Bias - ANS we tend to be more sensitive to the performance of individuals than we are of teams (coach gets blame more than team, or one star team member gets credit) Kelley's Theory of Casual Attribution - ANS behaviour gets attributed to causes based on circumstances that appear at the time. The three attributes are: consensus, consistency, distinctivness Consensus (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which others behave similarly to the person. If consensus is high (others similar), then high External reason for behaviour. Consistency (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which the person we are judging acts at other times in same context. If consistency is low, then high External reason for behavior. Distinctiveness (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which the person does NOT act in the same way in other contexts. If distinctiveness is high, then high External reason for behavior. Personality - ANS both our social reputation and our inner nature. Relatively stable, and unchanging over time. Type Approach - ANS personality definition that includes A vs. B, Myers-Briggs (MBIT). Not as useful or wide ranging, relys on bucketing. Type A - ANS aggressive, achievement oriented, more heart attacks Type B - ANS relaxed, more deliberate behavior, more second heart attacks Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBIT) - ANS personality type approach test that has 16 types (4 traits with 2 buckets each). Proved to be unreliable due to Trait Approach - ANS defines personalities with more precision, not binary/bucketed, NEO approach - ANS 5 broad factors of traits: Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness Neuroticism - ANS ability to control and manage negative emotions, control impulses, cope with stress (higher = worse) Conscientiousness - ANS purposeful, strong-willed, and determined. Punctual, and reliable. Achievement Striving - ANS aspect of conscientiousness, self-centered construct critical for the advancement of managers (competition). Escalate commitment to failing projects. Dutiful - ANS aspect of conscientiousness, more group success focused, critical for success of health care professionals (and similar), more likely to de-escalate commitment to failing projects Healthy Personality - ANS must exercise "core self-evaluation" and "emotional intelligence" Motivation - ANS manifests in the "direction" behavior is focused, "level of effort" and "persistence of effort" Theory X - ANS motivation idea assuming that workers naturally dislike work, are lazy, and need coercion to behave in motivating manner

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

UCL Organizational Behavior Final
Cognitive Dissonance - ANS when a person entertains two inconsistent thoughts, a negative feeling
occurs



Vicarious Dissonance - ANS when an individual places himself in a hypocrite's position and empathizes
with the other's feelings



Eliminating Cognitive Dissonance - ANS done by either one changing their opinion of themselves, their
view of others, or their environment



Induced Compliance Paradigm - ANS a person does or says something against their belief/attitude in
response to a coveted reward or the threat of punishment



Dissonance Shaping Human Behavior - ANS Done by either the application of insufficient punishment,
or the justification of effort



Insufficient Punishment - ANS mild penalties for undesirable behavior



Justification of Effort - ANS makes things seem more desirable (Frat Hazing, recruiting process,
compensation)



External Accuracy Bias's - ANS Four: Fundamental Attribution Error, Self-Serving Bias, Halo Error, Person
Sensitivity Bias



Fundamental Attribution Error - ANS Attributing the behaviors of others to internal factors, without
considering external factors

,Self-Serving Bias - ANS in others, we attribute failure to internal reasons and success to external
reasons. in ourselves, we do the opposite



Halo Error - ANS we tend to draw on a single characteristic when making wide-range evaluations of
individuals (looks, first impression, height, etc.)



Person Sensitivity Bias - ANS we tend to be more sensitive to the performance of individuals than we
are of teams (coach gets blame more than team, or one star team member gets credit)



Kelley's Theory of Casual Attribution - ANS behaviour gets attributed to causes based on circumstances
that appear at the time. The three attributes are: consensus, consistency, distinctivness



Consensus (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which others behave similarly to the person. If
consensus is high (others similar), then high External reason for behaviour.



Consistency (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which the person we are judging acts at other times
in same context. If consistency is low, then high External reason for behavior.



Distinctiveness (Casual Attribution) - ANS the extent to which the person does NOT act in the same way
in other contexts. If distinctiveness is high, then high External reason for behavior.



Personality - ANS both our social reputation and our inner nature. Relatively stable, and unchanging
over time.



Type Approach - ANS personality definition that includes A vs. B, Myers-Briggs (MBIT). Not as useful or
wide ranging, relys on bucketing.



Type A - ANS aggressive, achievement oriented, more heart attacks

, Type B - ANS relaxed, more deliberate behavior, more second heart attacks



Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBIT) - ANS personality type approach test that has 16 types (4 traits with
2 buckets each). Proved to be unreliable due to



Trait Approach - ANS defines personalities with more precision, not binary/bucketed,



NEO approach - ANS 5 broad factors of traits: Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and
Conscientiousness



Neuroticism - ANS ability to control and manage negative emotions, control impulses, cope with stress
(higher = worse)



Conscientiousness - ANS purposeful, strong-willed, and determined. Punctual, and reliable.



Achievement Striving - ANS aspect of conscientiousness, self-centered construct critical for the
advancement of managers (competition). Escalate commitment to failing projects.



Dutiful - ANS aspect of conscientiousness, more group success focused, critical for success of health
care professionals (and similar), more likely to de-escalate commitment to failing projects



Healthy Personality - ANS must exercise "core self-evaluation" and "emotional intelligence"



Motivation - ANS manifests in the "direction" behavior is focused, "level of effort" and "persistence of
effort"



Theory X - ANS motivation idea assuming that workers naturally dislike work, are lazy, and need
coercion to behave in motivating manner

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
8 februari 2024
Aantal pagina's
23
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$17.93
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
jessyqueen

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
jessyqueen London School of Economics
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
805
Laatst verkocht
3 weken geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen