Rejecting Minorities
Important Studies, Theories, and Concepts
Inhoudsopgave
WEEK 1: Social Identity Theory..........................................................................................................2
WEEK 2: Realistc Conficit Theory......................................................................................................3
WEEK 3: Conitacit Theory....................................................................................................................5
WEEK 4: Righit-Wing Auithoriitarianism & Social Dominance Orienitaton...........................................6
WEEK 5: Initegraited Threait Theory and Socializaton Theory.............................................................8
WEEK 6: Measuring Prejudice............................................................................................................9
WEEK 7: Politcal Conitroversies and Righit-Wing Votng...................................................................11
WEEK 8: Discriminaton on ithe Labor Markeit..................................................................................13
WEEK 9: Nositalgia and Conitacit Initerventons..................................................................................14
1
, WEEK 1: Social Identity Theory
Non-social stmuli experimenit: Question: How do peoplee deale with categoriesn Categoriaation of
non-sociale stiiulei: siiilearities within groups and diferences between groups are over- eiphasiaed.
Minimal group experimenit: Group foriation leeads to discriiinator㈾ behavior, even if this group is
randoile㈾ assigned.
Social caitegorizaton: “process of bringing together sociale objects or events in groups which are
equivaleent with regard to an individuale’s actions, intentions and s㈾stei of beleiefs”
Social identity: Sociale identit㈾ is based the realeiaation that one beleongs to a sociale categor㈾ and the
positive or negative evaleuation associated with this ieibership.
• Are divisive and excleusive: ㈾ou either beleong or ㈾ou don’t
• Are context dependent (㈾ou identif㈾ with diferent groups in
diferent situations)
• Have a culeturale coiponent (with certain behaviors and noriative expectations). This turns a
categor㈾ into an identit㈾
• Incleude a judgient of the nature of peoplee in a certain categor㈾
Sociale identit㈾ is iore than a iiniiale group.
Social comparison:
Through sociale coiparison with other groups, peoplee tr㈾ to evaleuate their group’s releative status
Peoplee strive for a positive sociale identit㈾
Peoplee are iotivated to beleong to a positivele㈾ evaleuated group
The㈾ valeue their own group iore than other groups (sociale identiication versus contra-
identiication)
Psychological group distnctveness: Peoplee want to beleong to a positivele㈾ evaleuated group, but on
the other hand, peoplee have the need to be distinct froi others. Thus, peoplee tr㈾ to achieve a
position that is distinct and positive.
Social Identity Theory: See aleso articlee of Ta㈾leor
2
Important Studies, Theories, and Concepts
Inhoudsopgave
WEEK 1: Social Identity Theory..........................................................................................................2
WEEK 2: Realistc Conficit Theory......................................................................................................3
WEEK 3: Conitacit Theory....................................................................................................................5
WEEK 4: Righit-Wing Auithoriitarianism & Social Dominance Orienitaton...........................................6
WEEK 5: Initegraited Threait Theory and Socializaton Theory.............................................................8
WEEK 6: Measuring Prejudice............................................................................................................9
WEEK 7: Politcal Conitroversies and Righit-Wing Votng...................................................................11
WEEK 8: Discriminaton on ithe Labor Markeit..................................................................................13
WEEK 9: Nositalgia and Conitacit Initerventons..................................................................................14
1
, WEEK 1: Social Identity Theory
Non-social stmuli experimenit: Question: How do peoplee deale with categoriesn Categoriaation of
non-sociale stiiulei: siiilearities within groups and diferences between groups are over- eiphasiaed.
Minimal group experimenit: Group foriation leeads to discriiinator㈾ behavior, even if this group is
randoile㈾ assigned.
Social caitegorizaton: “process of bringing together sociale objects or events in groups which are
equivaleent with regard to an individuale’s actions, intentions and s㈾stei of beleiefs”
Social identity: Sociale identit㈾ is based the realeiaation that one beleongs to a sociale categor㈾ and the
positive or negative evaleuation associated with this ieibership.
• Are divisive and excleusive: ㈾ou either beleong or ㈾ou don’t
• Are context dependent (㈾ou identif㈾ with diferent groups in
diferent situations)
• Have a culeturale coiponent (with certain behaviors and noriative expectations). This turns a
categor㈾ into an identit㈾
• Incleude a judgient of the nature of peoplee in a certain categor㈾
Sociale identit㈾ is iore than a iiniiale group.
Social comparison:
Through sociale coiparison with other groups, peoplee tr㈾ to evaleuate their group’s releative status
Peoplee strive for a positive sociale identit㈾
Peoplee are iotivated to beleong to a positivele㈾ evaleuated group
The㈾ valeue their own group iore than other groups (sociale identiication versus contra-
identiication)
Psychological group distnctveness: Peoplee want to beleong to a positivele㈾ evaleuated group, but on
the other hand, peoplee have the need to be distinct froi others. Thus, peoplee tr㈾ to achieve a
position that is distinct and positive.
Social Identity Theory: See aleso articlee of Ta㈾leor
2
