Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary European Union Law - Exam Synthesis

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
45
Geüpload op
16-03-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Complete synthesis (lecture, reading and tutorial notes) of European Union Law.

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

EUROPEAN UNION LAW

Politics, Psychology, Law and Economics

University of Amsterdam, 2021-2024

Jessica Qiu (13554123)

,1. Introduction to European Union Law

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS
● 1951 European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) 01/07/1952 into force, until
01/07/2022
○ Sectoral integration: of Coal and Steel to prevent another war, decision-making
power retrieved from MS, and delegated to 👇
○ Supranational: High Authority
○ Composition: 6 Member States ⇒ France, Germany, Italy, Benelux
● 1954 European Defence Community & European Political Community
⇒ trying to integrate more sensitive areas (than only the economy) as well but failed
⚠️today’s cooperation in these fields is still intergovernmental
● 1957 European Economic Community (EEC) & European Atomic Energy Community
(EAEC, Euratom) 01/01/1958 into force
○ EEC: General (common market) + sectoral economic integration (fisheries, transport)
○ Euratom: peaceful cooperation in the field of nuclear economy
⇒ 3 European Communities: ESCS + EEC + Euratom
● 1965 Merger Treaty 01/07/1967 into force
○ Before: each of the Communities with their own commission and council →

turned into only one for all three communities
[1973: UK, Ireland and Denmark → 9MS] [1981: Greece → 10MS] [1985: Spain, Portugal → 12MS]

● 1986 Single European Act (SEA) 01/07/1987 into force
○ Amendment to EEC Treaty: no more internal borders and establish internal market
+ competences to EEC in environmental protection
○ European Political Cooperation: cooperation in foreign affairs in

intergovernmental manner → Council and EU Council with last decision making

power (reason why own space in SEA instead of integrated to EEC)
● 1992 Treaty of Maastricht abolishment of communities structure
○ Establishing European Union with 3 pillars: no communities anymore
■ First: European Community (EEC + ECSC + Euratom)
■ Second: Common Foreign and Security Policy [Title V TEU]
■ Third: Justice and Home Affairs (migration) [Title VI TEU]
○ New policy areas: Economic Monetary Union, Education and Culture → EEC

Treaty no longer as economic so becoming EC ⇒ EEC into EC Treaty
[1995: Austria, Finland, Sweden → 15MS]



` 2

, ● 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam
○ Amendments to EC treaty + new policy areas
○ Amendments to EU treaty:
■ Communitarisation of migration → issues to first pillar (policy and civil)
■ Third pillar: Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters (PJCCM)
● 2001 Treaty of Nice
Preparation for Eastern enlargement ⇒ institutional changes (number of x)
[2004: Accession of 10 MS from Eastern Europe mostly → 25MS]

● 2004 Constitution for Europe
With constitutional terms such as flags, hymn, etc, but rejected in referenda France and NL
● 2007 Treaty of Lisbon 90% similar to Constitution but not asking referendum
○ New EU structure: abolishment of EC and three pillars structure
⇒ Founding treaties:
■ TEU: constitutional law, how to accede and leave EU, foreign policy
■ TFEU: substantive policy areas including third pillar, detailed rules on the
institutions [successor of EC Treaty]
■ Charter: same legal value as the TEU and TFEU, primary law [Art 6 TEU]
■ Euratom (+ Protocols)
[2007: Bulgaria, Romania → 27MS] [2013: Croatia → 28MS] [2020: Brexit → 27MS]


INSTITUTIONS
[Art 13 TEU: organs within the EU, 7 official ones (EP, EU Council, Council, Commission, CJEU,
Central Bank and Court of Auditors)]

Composition Tasks/Competences Voting

European Council [Art 15 TEU]

Heads of state/government Setting general political Consensus unless treaty
President direction and priorities of EU provides otherwise
Commission President → no decision-making power!

≠ Council of Europe: independent intergovernmental with more members (47), HR + culture

Council of Ministers [Art 16 TEU] - Federal chamber

27 representatives of gov Legislator with EP QMV in ordinary legislative
10 configurations with policy Budgetary powers with EP procedure except when treaty
Policy making decides otherwise: legal bases
Coordinating among Council Unanimity1 or simple majority2

= intergovernmental institution: representing national interests

1 Art 113 TFEU: harmonisation of indirect taxes // Art 352 TFEU: unforeseen cases
2 Art 240(3) TFEU: rules of procedure

` 3

, QMV = at least 55% (number of MS) representing 65% of the population (to make sure that big and
small states represented)
COREPER: committee to support the permanent representatives
- Coreper I: meeting of the ambassadors, prepares most political questions
- Corepert II: meeting of their deputies, most technical questions

European Commission [Art 17 TEU] - Executive branch

One commissioner / MS for 5 Exclusive right of initiative Simple majority of members
years → 2/3 rule since Lisbon Non-legislative acts (delegated [Art 250 TFEU]
and implementing acts)
but still 1C/MS3 Supervisory - Guardian of the
1 year and independent [17(3)] Treaties (cartel prohibition, MS
infringements, etc.)
Negotiate EU int treaties

Nomination by EU Council and elected by Parliament
⇒ solely EU institution (not representatives of states), representing interests of the Union ⚠️

European Parliament [Art 14 TEU] - Legislative chamber

< 751 including President, Legislator with Council* Simple majority of votes cast
directly elected for 5 years Budgetary with Council unless provided otherwise
→ represent Union’s citizens Elect President and approve [Art. 231 TFEU]
Degressively proportional4 Commission as a body
(nominated by EU Council)
Supervisory [14(8)]

Supervision: political control and consultation (power to debate by asking reports to Commission
and EU Council, question to Commission and investigate by setting temporary Committees)
⇒ hold executive accountable: vote of no confidence for the entirety of the Commission [14(8)]
Most supranational institution (before with minimal powers but not anymore)

Court of Justice of the EU [Art 19 TEU]

27 judges, 11 AG’s Ensure correct interpretation Majority with secret voting
54 judges (2/MS) and application of EU law [(3)] >< ECtHR with dissenting

Structure: Court of Justice + General Court (Court of First Instance - private parties and EU inst) +
Specialised Courts (but abolished)
Categories of competences:
[direct actions]
- Dispute settlement (inst v inst, MS v MS, MS v inst, ind v inst)
[indirect actions]
- Preliminary rulings at request of national judges (ind v MS, ind v ind) [Art 267 TFEU ⚠]
- Other tasks → advisory opinions on draft agreements between EU and third countries [Art 218(11)
TFEU]
→ looking at the compatibility with EU law and the agreement, if negative opinion, cannot enter


● EU legislation structure:
○ Primary law: 5 main with legal bases, enables institutions to adopt other leg 👇
3 Balance of democratic and federal system: if directly proportional, then some MS without seats but this
system also makes smaller countries with more votes than larger ones.
4 Art 17(5): 2/3 composition but deviations possible with EU Council acting in unanimity → Ireland
proposed it and everyone agreed.


` 4

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
16 maart 2024
Aantal pagina's
45
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$7.88
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
jessicafqiu Universiteit van Amsterdam
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
14
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
12
Laatst verkocht
5 maanden geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen