Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Lecture 1

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Uploaded on
21-02-2019
Written in
2017/2018

Lecture notes of 5 pages for the course Clinical Trials and Clinical Development at VU (HC1 van CTCD)

Institution
Course

Content preview

Lecture 1 Monday morning

GCP = good clinical practice = the best guideline ever

There is a commercial side & research side they are co-dependent; You have to research this
because otherwise you will not earn any money. You cannot research this because there is
no money for this.
Most companies are publically owned; they have to keep shareholders happy.

Media does a really good job sketching a skewed image of the big pharma.
1:4 new drugs earn back their development costs -> 75% of the developed products do not
earn back their development costs.

When the pipeline is not interesting enough you have to merge, or buy in new products,
‘licensing’. It is not enough to only have one blockbuster in your pipeline.

Economic downfall triggers big pharma to innovate

The clinical trials are highly regulated.
Development of biotech can be cheaper because the effect rate is higher.

Limiting development
-Availability of products (the lack of knowledge how to use these)
-Availability of money
-> more subjects in clinical trials is not a limiting factor

The pharmaceutical industry is disaster driven.

Only two big things went wrong lately. These both went wrong because of human error not
regulation.

-Normally in phase 1 trials they start with a really low dose in the first patient,
increasing the dose with every patient. This went wrong in the elephant trial. The first
dose was already too high, they reduced time between treatment. By the time they
realized something went wrong they already treated five people.

-2016- France. Without taking into account the patient was hospitalized the next
patient was already treated.

In the Netherlands, there was a problem with a probiotic trial. The control group was
healthier than the case group.

 It is not always the product that is to blame. Sometimes other things have to be
taken into account.

Products that are successful are not being used because it is too expensive and not
reimbursed.

, -Heparine example: no idea how it dilutes, effect blood clotting -> patients are not
safe. The new product can accurately dilute but is not reimbursed therefore it is not
used in the Netherlands

There are examples of overprized products but generally pricing is challenged.

PLC (product life cycle) at the end of patent life, it jumps down because of generics.
Companies will do whatever they can to increase patent life.

Import licenses are very hard to get
-If a physician knows to ask, the patients who need it can get free samples. If it is not
going to be reimbursed, you are not going to authorize it on the market because that
is expensive and if people are not going to buy it anyway because they cannot afford
it.

Introduction to clinical research

-Ethical standards
-Sound scientific proof

Facts from the past are not the facts from now, facts that used to be can be proven
otherwise
-Hysteria for woman
It is a society concept, something that we hold to be true but it does not have to be true.

When is something scientifically proven?
-Replicability -> same outcome
-If you try to prove that it is not true, you can’t
CI = 95% in clinical trials

There is a 10-20% chance for a product being rejected if the effectiveness is not high enough.
Companies can decide that even though it is effective it might be very expensive and
therefore not to follow through with development.

What is a clinical trial?
One step in drug development process
Involving human subjects
Investigate new methods of preventing, diagnosing or treating a disease
-Mostly interventional trials
-Sometimes observational trials
-(Non)-industry
Off-label use is mostly not done in non-industry.

Which parties are involved?
-Sponsor
-Investigator/site
-Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (IRB/IEC)

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 21, 2019
Number of pages
5
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Unknown
Contains
All classes

Subjects

$4.17
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
annelotte444

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
annelotte444 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
4
Documents
19
Last sold
3 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions