BORDER PATROL ACTUAL EXAM (NEW) ALL QUESTIONS AND WELL ELABORATED ANSWERS ALREADY GRADED A WITH EXPERT FEEDBACK TOP RATED VERSION (REVISED)

BORDER PATROL ACTUAL EXAM (NEW) ALL QUESTIONS AND WELL ELABORATED ANSWERS ALREADY GRADED A WITH EXPERT FEEDBACK TOP RATED VERSION (REVISED) Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se-inherently evil-or malum prohibitum- criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the latter. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still doA) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum C) Some crimes characterized as malum in se are not inherently evil D) Some crimes characterized as malum prohibitum are not declared by a legislature to be an offense E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as malum in se :correct answers:B - This question is concerned with classification of crimes into sets-that is, with the classification of crimes as either malum in se or malum prohibitum. The last phrase in the last sentence tells us that many jurisdictions make the distinction between these two categories of crimes. Response B follows from that sentence, because if many jurisdictions make the distinction, some jurisdictions make the distinction. From the fact that many jurisdictions make the distinction, it cannot be inferred that many do not make the distinction. Therefore, Response A is incorrect.